Tuesday, July 15, 2008
The rising of the Sharia in United Kingdom, a real nightmare, by Iba Bouramine
For example, Muslims could choose to submit their disputes marital or financial contributions to Shariah courts.
He said that Muslims should not have to choose between "dark alternative loyalty to their culture or the state."
(...) Dr Williams argued the need for Shariah is better understood.
He said that currently, "sensationalist reports on opinion polls mask the problem.
He stressed that "no sane person would want to see in this country the kind of inhumanity sometimes associated with the application of Sharia in some Islamic States; punishment extreme attitudes towards women also".
The Reverend John Packer said during a debate on the rule of law in the House of Lords that it is important not to deny the religious communities, including Islam, "the right to apply its ethical standards and moral where they do not infringe human rights. "
He regretted the recent decision to require Catholic adoption agencies to place children with gay couples, "in violation of freedom of conscience of Roman Catholics in question."
"Our human rights must not make us forget the benefits of cultural laws."
He added: "In our legitimate concern for women's rights under the law, and our criticism of certain provisions of the Shariah, we must also be careful not to condemn everything that comes from this tradition."
"In Leeds, as elsewhere, we welcomed the offer of loans and mortgages conform to the Shariah as an example of multicultural integration that has allowed businessmen Muslims to take part in the financial economy of our country. "
"The discussions surrounding these loans and mortgages have allowed to challenge our own secular culture where the interest and debts are simply taken for granted."
He added: "The protection under the law is essential to our society and must remain so".
"At the same time, we must defend the right of cultural and religious groups to assert their moral and ethical standards, including the right of Christian communities to do so. Indeed, we can draw lessons for improving the common good of our entire culture. "
Great Britain - A Muslim leader calls for public floggings in downtown
This is only a matter of time before that corporal punishment prescribed by the Sharia - Public floggings, stonings, amputations - are charged in Britain. The Islamists are étapistes, and leaders of the English naïvistes and cowards ...
A Muslim leader believes that those who commit assault with a knife should be imprisoned for 42 days as suspected terrorists.
Sarfraz Sarwar, 60, said he saw no difference between the epidemic of knife attacks and those who are accused of plotting and executing terrorist attacks.
Mr Sarwar, Gordons, Pitsea, also supported applications for the Shariah is enforced in Britain and said that we should carry out public floggings in inner cities.
Mr Sarwar said: "What is the difference between assault with a knife and suicide bombings?"
Great Britain - Another preacher calls floggings, amputations and executions
Glané on Bivouac-ID
He launched his appeal for such Islamic punishments while still raging controversy around the support for Sharia recently expressed by the President of the High Court of Justice.
Zahra belongs to the Islamic trend lasts Hizb Ut-Tahrir, which has previously suffered a ban. In his sermon at the mosque in Regent's Park in London, he denounced the British democracy as criminal.
The Conservative MP Philip Davies said: "It is unacceptable"
Source : Yahoo News, The Sun
Labels: Iba Bouramine, Islam, Secularism, Sharia, United Kingdom
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]