Thursday, April 30, 2009

 

Pakistan: The Taliban are running a couple in front of the camera, by Francis Chartrand


Telegraph: The execution of a couple accused of adultery by the Taliban is filmed

They had a sordid death, riddled with bullets by the Taliban in a field near their home, their execution was filmed with a mobile phone.

In these images that the Pakistanis have watched with horror, the couple tried to escape after he realized what was about to happen. But a gunman slaughters nonchalantly man and woman in a burst of gunfire in the back, leaving them bloody in the dust.

Moments later, when individuals present at the execution shout they are still alive, the gunman returned and complete coldly by other bursts.

Their "crime" was an alleged liaison in their remote village in the mountains controlled by militants in a region that until recently was under government control. Such barbarism has increased across Pakistan with the rise of the Taliban.

But now that the men in black turbans are almost on the outskirts of Islamabad, the images showed few Pakistanis living in cities which could now expect.

Admiral Mike Mullen, Chief of the major arms of the United States, warned that Islamic extremists could take over the country.

In recent days, the images were circulated among the Pakistanis, who normally showed little interest in the brutal practices of the remote border regions.

They are now beginning to wake up to the fear that rebels in those regions that are linked to Al-Qaeda could take control of their nation.

The execution occurred in the district of Hangu, in the province of North West Frontier (PFNO), about two hours drive from Peshawar, the regional capital. The couple was executed by a local group of Pakistani Taliban, the Islamic militia that swept the PFNO in its march towards the capital Islamabad.

"The Taliban are strong and confident, the government is weak and hesitant," said Pervez Hoodbhoy, a professor at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad and one of the leading intellectuals of Pakistan.

"A victory for the Taliban reduce our women to slavery, destroy the rich historical and cultural heritage of Pakistan, will make education and science impossible, and the lives of citizens will be incredibly difficult. Some are already planning an exodus. "

Pakistan is now on the verge of the abyss and risk anarchy. The agreement signed with the desperate Taliban in Swat appears near collapse. The result will almost certainly be violence. Saturday morning, an army convoy en route to Swat was arrested by the Taliban and forced to turn in an open demonstration of their power.

The peace agreement appears to have only emboldened them. Many people think that a bloody military operation now seems inevitable.

Those living in the regions fell into the hands of the Taliban are terrified by the cruelty of their administration.

A text message sent SOS Friday terrified by a resident of a region called Swat Bahrain, said that the Taliban have established full control. Asking not to be named for fear of reprisals, he said they have set up checkpoints at the entrance to Bahrain where they kidnap who they want, including young women.

"They even warned the schools to close classes for girls, otherwise the consequences would be terrible. But the government says it has jurisdiction over Swat.

Another resident of Swat, said: "Every day I see armed Taliban movement. At the time of prayer, if they see someone in his shop or walking on the street, they strike with a stick."

The Pakistani Taliban, clones of the extremist movement in Afghanistan, has long controlled the tribal region along the Afghan border, a haven for militants, including al Qaeda. But it is progressing towards the center of the country which has shocked ordinary Pakistanis and the world. And the threat comes not only from the Taliban to the west. Islamic extremists, who are not part of the Taliban movement, are already firmly established in Islamabad and across the Punjab, the most populous province, apparently ready to show their time.

Islamabad's defenses were fortified emergency and paramilitary troops have been stationed on the Margalla hills overlooking the city from the west. In the capital, the radical Red Mosque has thousands of followers, and there are now open calls for Islamic revolution in Friday sermons.

"The Taliban will not stop in Swat. They will go to Islamabad," said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a military analyst based in Lahore. "If the army is taking action against them, it will be a bloody battle. And the civilian government will be aside."

"Extremist groups based in Islamabad will emerge from the inside and they (the Taliban) will increase the pressure from outside."

The video Pakistanis watching their shows what they can expect. A local journalist was invited to attend the execution, and he filmed with his mobile phone to the Pakistani channel Dawn News. The Sunday Telegraph shows the sequence to the West for the first time.

The two victims are not named.

"The use of media is part of their (the Taliban) psychological warfare," said Imtiaz Gul, president of the Center for Research and Security Studies, an independent think tank in Islamabad. "In this way, they spread fear in the minds of those who would oppose them, reducing the majority of people to silence."

After the couple was killed, families were told to remove the body for burial. The punishment was administered by a local group linked to Pakistani Taliban warlord Baitullah Mehsud.

Source: Taliban gunmen shooting dead for adultery couple caught on camera, Telegraph, 26 April 2009



Labels: , , , ,


Saturday, April 04, 2009

 

Pakistan - (video) A 17-year-old whipped in public in Swat, which is governed by the sharia, by Marie-Êve Marineau




The blurred images appear to show a girl aged 17 being beaten by radical Islamists in the Swat region of northwest Pakistan where Sharia has been introduced after the conclusion of a truce with the Taliban in February.

A local commander of the Taliban in Matta, a militant stronghold 25 miles from the regional capital, Mingora, ordered that the girl was whipped a week ago after being accused of adultery, according to local reporters.

But some residents of Matta have accused the commander had ordered that the girl was beaten to avenge she refused his proposal of marriage, told reporters at the Times.

"Please! Enough! Enough!" implored the girl in Pashtu, the language of the tribes that dominate the north-west Pakistan, now the main hub of Taliban and al Qaeda.

At another point, she exclaimed: "I repent, my father repents, what I did, my grandmother repent for what I did ... "

The man who insults the flagellum his colleague who is struggling to control the girl and to prevent him from protecting his back with his hands.

We hear: "You must keep it tight so it does not move."

The President Zardari stressed that the truce was signed with "moderate"....

Link

Labels: , , ,


 

Great Britain - Great anti-Sharia demonstration in London. "Une loi pour tous !", par Iba Bouramine "One law for all", by Iba Bouramine


The British know that the protests we have seen in Ontario in 2005 after a government commission has recommended the introduction of Sharia law. This attempt failed thanks to the efforts of the Toronto Homa Arjomand who orchestrated an international campaign to combat it. In Britain, the former Muslim Maryam Namazie who coordinates the campaign.

Recently, the Globe and Mail shamelessly opened its pages to a review of the Islamist Sheema Khan, who called - again! - for the introduction of sharia law in Ontario. Across the West, obsessed with Islamic Sharia, they never let go.

A law for all! ...legal pluralism, it's racism!

Hundreds of people from all backgrounds and ethnicities gathered on Saturday 7 March 2009 in Trafalgar Square for a rally against the sharia. This event was to celebrate the International Year of Women, and many women were present to take a stand against this system of unjust and discriminatory laws.

After several eloquent speeches, the rally ended and the event began. Many curious have proclaimed their approval, and many of them chose to join the march. This illustrates how widespread the dissatisfaction with politics islamophile Labor. There is a larger groundswell of opposition to sharia law among citizens and the political elite should pay attention to the fact that the barbarism of Sharia will never be tolerated in Britain, and that parties who are the lawyers and the government does now, are doomed to political failure.

It is really amazing that people are forced to protest against Sharia law in Britain in the 21st century. This is the terrible reflection of the policy of a government that has claimed so long as it modernized Britain. It seems that the idea of modernization meant a return to an era of medieval barbarism.

The march ended at Conway Hall and was followed by a public meeting. The most positive message that is out of this day was that of a left that had awakened, begins to question the idea of multiculturalism, and to the extent of the damage that this ideology has led to 'social harmony and the institutions of Britain. See the sacred cow of multiculturalism be rejected by some of its former supporters is a very positive development. It was said at that meeting that multiculturalism is a big step towards a society of apartheid and that this can not be canceled only by a single law that applies equally to all.

Link

Labels: , , , ,


Monday, February 09, 2009

 

Canada - Islamist Sheema Khan calls for Sharia courts. Again!, by Iba Bouramine


Sheema Khan, Islamist by his own words, the founder of CAIR-CAN, would like to see the issue of Sharia discount on the agenda. It is a true obsession ... After a first unsuccessful attempt to introduce sharia law in Ontario in 2005, which was blocked by the international campaign launched by the Toronto Homa Arjomand, is that Sheema Khan fights back!

Also note the approach of Mrs Khan: Muslims need sharia because of the malice of Canadians! In fact, she seeks to spread the ideology of Saudi Arabia in Canada. It was his purpose in life. Ms. Khan, if you want to live under sharia law, why do not you move in a Muslim country?

In the U.S., the FBI has cut all contact with CAIR because of its links with the terrorist organization Hamas.

The atheist Pat Condell: Stop sharia law in Britain. The first clip on the subject was censored by YouTube, and then republished. He produced it afterwards:



In December 2006, the Environics polling firm interviewed 500 Muslim adults across Canada on issues related to their experience of life in Canada.

The majority think they are better treated here than in any other Western country, that the quality of life of Muslim women is better here than anywhere else (including most Muslim countries), that Canadians are less hostile to 'Islam as European citizens, and they are willing to adopt Canadian customs.

Yet 44% of Canadian Muslims believe that Canada should accommodate their beliefs, while 81% of the population believe that immigrants should adopt Canadian values. In particular, 53% of Muslims believe that Sharia should be recognized as the legal basis for resolving family disputes, while the overwhelming majority of the population as a whole does not agree.

Among those surveyed, 55% Muslim and 59% of Muslims aged 18 to 29 have indicated their preference for Shariah. These figures suggest that the question of the use of Sharia in Canada is far from dead, even if the courts of arbitration of Shariah are considered illegal in several provinces.

Here the underlying question: Why this growing affinity for sharia? Since 9 / 11, Muslims in Canada have experienced an increase in discrimination. This has a direct impact on identity and how a minority perceives its acceptance by the majority. The acerbic, sometimes racist, the controversial debate on sharia law in Ontario has forced many Muslims to focus on sharia as part of their identity, with the result that a plurality wants to respect the Islamic principles in the law the family.

Making illegal Islamic Courts will not remove the problem. In the absence of court supervision informal sharia, it risks being confused with the situation prevailing in Britain.

Link

Labels: , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 15, 2008

 

The rising of the Sharia in United Kingdom, a real nightmare, by Iba Bouramine

Great Britain - The adoption of Sharia "inevitable"


The Archbishop of Canterbury said that the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia in the United Kingdom "seems inevitable".
Dr Rowan Williams told the issuance World at One on Radio 4 that the United Kingdom must "face the fact that some of its citizens do not identify with the British legal system."
Dr Williams argued that the adoption of certain parts of the Islamic Shariah would maintain social cohesion.


For example, Muslims could choose to submit their disputes marital or financial contributions to Shariah courts.

He said that Muslims should not have to choose between "dark alternative loyalty to their culture or the state."

(...) Dr Williams argued the need for Shariah is better understood.

He said that currently, "sensationalist reports on opinion polls mask the problem.

He stressed that "no sane person would want to see in this country the kind of inhumanity sometimes associated with the application of Sharia in some Islamic States; punishment extreme attitudes towards women also".

Great Britain - Another bishop supports Shariah

London: Religious communities should be allowed to apply their own legal systems insofar as they do not conflict with human rights, said the Bishop of Ripon and Leeds.


The Reverend John Packer said during a debate on the rule of law in the House of Lords that it is important not to deny the religious communities, including Islam, "the right to apply its ethical standards and moral where they do not infringe human rights. "

His comments come in the wake of controversial remarks by the Archbishop of Canterbury on Sharia.

Bishop Packer said the Church's law to refuse marriage to divorced people and the Jewish Beth Din courts and customary law of Somalia who can "settle disputes in the safety of a particular cultural group without resorting to Justice secular "and provide a" haven for independent auctions. "

He regretted the recent decision to require Catholic adoption agencies to place children with gay couples, "in violation of freedom of conscience of Roman Catholics in question."

"There are many aspects of practical and legal systems of different communities and cultures in countries that we must welcome, as well as others that we must condemn because contrary to human rights," he said.

"Our human rights must not make us forget the benefits of cultural laws."

He added: "In our legitimate concern for women's rights under the law, and our criticism of certain provisions of the Shariah, we must also be careful not to condemn everything that comes from this tradition."

"In Leeds, as elsewhere, we welcomed the offer of loans and mortgages conform to the Shariah as an example of multicultural integration that has allowed businessmen Muslims to take part in the financial economy of our country. "

"The discussions surrounding these loans and mortgages have allowed to challenge our own secular culture where the interest and debts are simply taken for granted."

He added: "The protection under the law is essential to our society and must remain so".

"At the same time, we must defend the right of cultural and religious groups to assert their moral and ethical standards, including the right of Christian communities to do so. Indeed, we can draw lessons for improving the common good of our entire culture. "

Great Britain - A Muslim leader calls for public floggings in downtown

This is only a matter of time before that corporal punishment prescribed by the Sharia - Public floggings, stonings, amputations - are charged in Britain. The Islamists are étapistes, and leaders of the English naïvistes and cowards ...

A Muslim leader believes that those who commit assault with a knife should be imprisoned for 42 days as suspected terrorists.

Sarfraz Sarwar, 60, said he saw no difference between the epidemic of knife attacks and those who are accused of plotting and executing terrorist attacks.

Mr Sarwar, Gordons, Pitsea, also supported applications for the Shariah is enforced in Britain and said that we should carry out public floggings in inner cities.
His comments follow those of the President of the High Court of England, Lord Phillips, who said that could be used to aspects of Sharia law to settle disputes Islamic, but not before the courts.

Mr Sarwar said: "What is the difference between assault with a knife and suicide bombings?"

"We should treat them just like terrorists, they should be detained for 42 days, interrogated and thrown into prison to resolve the problem."

He said that the Shariah would act as a deterrent in solving crime in Britain.

He added: "If someone is taken with a knife then give him ten lashes downtown."

"Sharia is not controversial. It is a means of deterrence. The Muslim countries do not have half the problems we have, because they apply sharia. "

Mr. Sarwar continues to manage a support group for minorities in Basildon. He was the leader of Basildon Islamic Centre, Laindon, before it is burned in 2006.

Mr Sarwar is also very concerned about the safety of Muslims today and said that racist insults have increased since the attacks of 7 / 7 in London in 2005.

He said: "What is happening is mainly due to misunderstanding. Perhaps there a fear of the unknown ".

"It is very difficult to understand the reasons for this phenomenon. I thought we lived in a modern European country, but it's like the Victorian era. There are a lot of hatred. "

Mr Sarwar appeared in a documentary for Channel 4 on evening on July 9 on the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of 7 / 7.


Great Britain - Another preacher calls floggings, amputations and executions

Statements by Islamist preachers follow and look alike. Few days ago, a Muslim cleric said that we should proceed with public floggings in inner cities. This is only a matter of time ...


Glané on Bivouac-ID

A Muslim extremist preacher demanded the death penalty and flogging in a harangue made in the mosque's most famous of Great Britain.

Abu Zahra said: "The thieves, men and women, amputez their hands. Those who kill, their life is precarious." And he was taken violently to sex outside of marriage: "Whisk them."

He launched his appeal for such Islamic punishments while still raging controversy around the support for Sharia recently expressed by the President of the High Court of Justice.

Zahra belongs to the Islamic trend lasts Hizb Ut-Tahrir, which has previously suffered a ban. In his sermon at the mosque in Regent's Park in London, he denounced the British democracy as criminal.

The Conservative MP Philip Davies said: "It is unacceptable"

Source : Yahoo News, The Sun

Source : 1 2 3 4

Labels: , , , ,


 

Afghanistan - 2 women brutally murdered by the Taliban while AP filmed. And ethics?, by Noémie Cournoyer

A photographer from the agency AP films the murder of two women by the Taliban. The AP photographer Rahmatullah Naikzad has witnessed a murder by the Taliban. Both women were prostitutes serving western customers.

On the evening of July 12, 2008, two unidentified Afghan women talk among themselves a few minutes before being executed by the Taliban in the province of Ghazni, Afghanistan

(AP Photo / Rahmatullah Naikzad) (original here)

Sunday, July 13, the locals watch the two women killed by the Afghan Taliban

(AP Photo/Rahmatullah Naikzad) (original here)

This page of the AP suggests that Rahmatullah Naikzad also shot a video of the killing of two women. [Update: Yes, he did. Video added to the end]

We wish to remind AP that the Taliban have invited a journalist in the assassination means that they wanted the news is disseminated. AP has clearly been used as a tool of propaganda by the Taliban.

Does this fact of the photographer or an accomplice only a witness to the crime? When you know that a crime is about to be committed, did not you a moral and ethical obligation to try to prevent this crime? Even if you are a journalist? Even if all you do is try to alert authorities - in this case, someone in the Afghan government or NATO?

A quick search of Rahmatullah Naikzad photos on Yahoo News seems to indicate that it is very friendly with the Taliban. Most of the photos show Taliban fighters posing for the AP photographer. Par exemple : For example:

(AP Photo/Rahmatullah Naikzad) (original here)

Naikzad seems to have been incorporated into the Taliban during the day, before the two women were murdered. The photo below, taken by Naikzad, this legend:

Some Taliban militants face covered train before they have executed two women in the Afghan province of Ghazni, Afghanistan, Saturday, July 12, 2008 (original here)

You will notice by the caption under the photo first on top of this page that has clearly been taken at night a few minutes before the two women were murdered. The second photo above, showing the bodies of two women, was clearly taken the day after the murder of two women. This means that Rahmatullah Naikzad has spent at least 24 hours with the Taliban!

What did Rahmatullah Naikzad to prevent the murder of two women? Or, what does it now to help find the killers? I would be surprised if the answer is something other than nothing.

Again, AP provides assistance and encouragement to the enemy. This time, a group on the U.S. list of foreign terrorist organizations and to which several Security Council resolutions prohibit providing any assistance.

AP receive there a Pulitzer Prize this time?

Thanks to Phyllis Chessler for reporting the photo.

UPDATE: If you remember, AP had tried to excuse the photos that Bilal Hussein had taken two "insurgents" laying on the body of murdered hostage Salvatore Santoro claiming he had been forcibly taken by the terrorists who showed him the body after Santoro was killed. This time, AP has no such excuse.

If we accept the version of AP about the photos of Santoro by Bilal Hussein, then photos of Rahmatullah Naikzad are clearly worse than those of Hussein! He witnessed the murder of two women!

UPDATE II: It is getting worse. A video was produced by Naikzad (below). It's terrible. The two women were murdered overnight, then it's not visually graphic, but the sound is terrible. You can hear one of the women scream after the first bullets have been fired.

It's official: The AP has now replaced al Jazeera as official media to disseminate videos of terrorists.

UPDATE III: AllahP great case of violation by AP of its own ethical standards. Also note his views on the difference between the anti-Jihad websites showing these images and territory "neutral" by AP showed.

The essential point here is the context in which photos / videos are shown.

In the context of this blog, it is clear that the photos are intended to demonstrate this terrible evil that we are fighting. But when AP decides to use neutral terms to contextualize the photos, a limit is crossed to a moral relativism which is more than merely unpatriotic. It is downright disgusting!

Instead of calling the Taliban what they are - criminals of war and unlawful combatants primae faciea - they refer to simply as "militants". Worse, they allow the Taliban to choose words to describe the horrible murder of two women - an execution.

The more I think about it, this suggests that AP is worse than al-Jazeera. Remember when we were all outraged by Al-Jazeera showing videos produced by terrorists? The video was filmed terrorist by the AP.

UPDATE IV : Drew M : No word yet on whether AP will continue if the Taliban are using photos or extracts from its history on their sites to recruit jihadists.

UPDATE V : Pirate’s Cove raises the final question: Are all these feminist groups left that we never hear about the plight of women in Islam denounce what the AP did?

WARNING: AP explicit video showing the killing of two women by the Taliban

See online: The Jawa Report, by Dr. Rusty Shackleford, July 14, 2008

Labels: , , , ,


Friday, June 20, 2008

 

The Canadian Muslims opposed to Sharia are a minority and are hounded by Anne Humphreys



R. Spencer et les musulmans modérés
par Tazda



R. Spencer and moderate Muslims
by
Tazda

R. Spencer and moderate Muslims
sent by
Tazda
Here is the transcript of the video resulted in
Pistache l'insoumise. We also invite you to fly over the excellent blog Pistache.

The Islamic reformers are often targeted as qu'apostats (people who left Islam) by jihadists.

Farzana Hassan Shahid, the new president of the Muslim Canadian Congress (MCC), is the latest victim of this phenomenon.

After his liberal views on many issues islamicly "hot" have begun to be known, she began to receive threats from Muslim supporters of strong-arm tactics, which saw its positions signs of his desertion of Islam. One of them called "the little sister of Satan", while another accosta her husband in a mosque in Ontario and demanded that he "control his wife."

Farzana Hassan Shahid explained itself, there is a latent fear all the time… this sense of unease is part of my daily life. I have been declared apostate twice, having opposed the Shariah (Islamic law).

Hassan Shahid is not the first representative of the MCC to be covered by the Jihadists. Until recently, Tarek Fatah was the communications director of MCC .. But in August he abruptly démissiona.

Fatah had long been a leading voice parte Muslims in Canada. And as communications director of the CMC, he never avoided controversy, adhering to certain views about the rights of homosexuals and other issues that deviate from Islamic orthodoxy. Opposing views that Hassan Shahid has now occasions.

Fatah had even opposed the campaign in 2005 to introduce the Canada room arbitration based on Sharia. But instead of receiving congratulations from the Canadian Muslim community, Fatah became the target of an email campaign initiated by a group of étudians, the Islamic Canadian Congress. The ICC said that Fatah does not represent the majority of Canadian Muslims.

Fatah commented, "this is what the issue may have closer to a death threat, since this class me as an apostate and blasphemer." And Fatah, like Farzana Hassan Shahid, has received death threats very clear.

The voices of moderation or reform within the Islamic community are clearly disadvantageous position, because the Jihadists can very effectively use the Quran and Sunnah against them. In addition, all schools of law of Islam explain a MUST apostate be killed, a command rooted in the teachings of Muhammad, who said:

"If somebody (a Muslim) abandons his religion, kill it. "

Thus, threatening to kill someone can become an act of piety.

It is ironic that Western non-Muslims observers, who know nothing or very little of Islam, presume that the voices or liberal reformers are predominant in the Islamic communities of the West and by the way, whereas the reality is that people like Farzana Hassan Shahid and Tarek Fatah had very little influence among Muslims, and over all, they are hunted people.

The Muslim reformers deserve all the support we can give them, but we should stop deluding us into thinking that they are a majority.

And most importantly, government representatives and the law should stop designing policies based on the assumption that people like Farzana Hassan Shahid and Tarek Fatah are really the majority.
Link Via Marc Lebuis

Labels: , , , , , ,


Thursday, May 22, 2008

 

The 37 recommendations in the final report of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission

Montréal, May 22, 2008 – The Consultation Commission on Accommodation Practices Related to Cultural Differences (CCPARDC) today made public the 37 recommendations in its final report, which are listed below.

A) Learning diversity

The Co-Chairs recommend that:

A1. the Québec government provide much more extensive funding to organizations with a mandate to inform and protect citizens. We are thinking, first and foremost, of the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse and the Conseil des relations interculturelles;

A2. the government encourage projects and initiatives that enable members of the ethnic minorities to make themselves more extensively seen and heard by the general public through radio or television programs, theme days, and so on;

A3. the government increase financial support for organizations such as the Fondation de la tolérance, the Institut du Nouveau Monde and Vision Diversité. It should also encourage the creation of other similar projects throughout Québec devoted to information, training, intercommunity action, intercultural debate and the dissemination of pluralism;

A4. the government also increase its support for similar, equally promising initiatives already under way or in preparation in the education and health sectors.

B) Harmonization practices

The Co-Chairs recommend that:

B1. the government broaden its efforts to promote the common civic framework or what we have called common public values in institutions and among Quebecers in general;


B2. the managers of public institutions step up their efforts to:


B3. in keeping with the objective of dejudicializing the handling of accommodation requests, the government foster the accountability of interveners in institutions by ensuring that they have received adequate training. Some examples are the modification of the training program for future teachers to include additional instruction time devoted to intercultural questions and the organization of specialized sessions for current teachers;


B4. the government ensure that health care establishments have sufficient funds to cover their needs for interpreters’ services;


B5. the government implement the necessary mechanisms to:


B6. The Co-Chairs approve of the initiative now under way in the National Assembly to introduce into the Québec Charter an interpretation clause that establishes gender equality as a core value of our society.


Moreover, the Co-Chairs recommend that:


B7. the government establish an Office d’harmonisation interculturelle, a paragovernmental body that reports to the Conseil des relations interculturelles, which works in tandem with other agencies in related fields. This body would, in particular, play a role with respect to information, training, coordination, advice, and research centred on intercultural harmonization practices, including interdenominational practices, in our society.


B8. Religious holidays:


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


B9. the government highlight excellence in the realm of harmonization practices in the workplace by:

C) The integration of immigrants


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


C1. from the standpoint of the planning of immigration rates, the government make sure that the number of immigrants admitted corresponds to the reception resources available, especially in respect of labour market integration and francization;


C2. in order to overcome a serious deficiency that is now apparent, the government increase funding for community groups and other front-line organizations devoted to welcoming and integrating immigrants, in particular to consolidate and develop the existing network of organizations while avoiding a piecemeal approach;


C3. the government step up its efforts in respect of the francization and integration of immigrants by:


C4. the government step up measures to accelerate the process of recognizing skills and diplomas acquired abroad. Among the urgent measures, we recommend:


C5. the government step up its efforts to foster the regionalization of immigration. In this spirit, it would be advisable to:


C6. to facilitate the integration of newcomers, the ministère de l’Immigration et des Communautés culturelles create for them an interactive portal in order to centralize all information on resources and institutional services, including municipal and community resources and services, with respect to employment, housing, health, education, and so on;


C7. the government increase funding for organizations that support immigrant women;


C8. the ministère de l’Immigration et des Communautés culturelles adopt the appropriate measures to make the most of Québec volunteer work for the purpose of welcoming and integrating immigrants, in particular to enable them to gain access to social networks;à


C9. the government department now responsible for immigration be renamed the ministère de l’Immigration et des Relations interculturelles.


D) Interculturalism


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


D1. the government launch a vigorous campaign to promote interculturalism in Québec society to broaden awareness of it;


D2. to better establish interculturalism as a model that prevails over intercultural relations in Québec, the government enshrine interculturalism in a statute, a policy statement or a declaration and that this initiative include public consultations and a vote in the National Assembly;


D3. the government encourage all forms of intercultural contact as a means of reducing stereotypes and fostering participation in and integration into Québec society. In this spirit:

D4. a Fonds d’histoires de vie des immigrants be established, to be managed by the Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec;


D5. the government pay close attention to testimony presented concerning so-called ethno-denominational schools.


E) Inequality and discrimination


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


E1. the government seek to better understand and combat the different forms of racism, especially ethnism, found in our society. In this spirit:

E2. government mandataries and agencies be responsible for their results in respect of the fight against racism and discrimination and that accountability mechanisms be introduced for this purpose based on performance indicators;


E3. the National Assembly follow up on a recommendation made by the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse aimed at strengthening the economic and social rights recognized in sections 39 to 48 in the Québec Charter:“The Commission recommends that the economic and social rights recognized in sections 39 to 48 of the Charter be strengthened in light of:


F) The French language


The report does not contain any formal recommendation since the CCPARDC deemed this theme to be on the margin of its mandate. That being the case, the Co-Chairs have reviewed the situation in their report.


G) Secularism


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


G1. the government draft a white paper on secularism in order to:


G2. with regard to the wearing by government employees of religious signs:

G3. measures be adopted to bring certain practices in public institutions into line with the principles of open secularism. Consequently, in the name of the separation of the State and the churches and in the name of State neutrality, we recommend that:


G5. the government produce and disseminate every year among the managers of institutions and public or private organizations a multidenominational calendar that indicates the dates of religious holidays.


H) Research to be conducted


The Co-Chairs recommend that:


H1. the government free up additional research funds that would be earmarked, in particular, for the study of:

H2. the government set up a special grant fund reserved for universities and Cegeps in the regions to fund applied research devoted to the general theme of immigration and integration in the regions.


The Commission


At the request of Premier Jean Charest, the CCPARDC took stock of accommodation practices, conducted a public consultation throughout Québec and examined the attendant questions.


Individuals, groups and associations submitted over 900 briefs and 241 people testified during the 31 days of hearings. All told, 22 regional forums attracted 3 423 participants and over 800 people took part in four province-wide forums. Moreover, 13 research projects conducted by specialists from Québec universities were commissioned and 31 focus groups were organized throughout Québec in which participants came from varied backgrounds.


When it concludes its activities in June, the CCPARDC will have spent $3.7 million of a total budget of $5.1 million. The final report and related documents can be consulted online (www.accommodements.qc.ca).

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


 

Open secularism, interculturalism, the fight against discrimination and guidelines for accommodation form the core of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission’s

Montréal, May 22, 2008 – The adoption by the government of basic texts in order to define open secularism and typically Québec-style interculturalism are two of the priority recommendations in the final report of the Consultation Commission on Accommodation Practices Related to Cultural Differences (CCPARDC). The report, which Commission Co-Chairs Gérard Bouchard and Charles Taylor made public today, also recommends additional measures to combat discrimination and promote reconciliation in the realm of accommodation practices. Recourse to the citizen route and concerted adjustment should be emphasized instead of the legal route from the standpoint of reasonable accommodation.

Foster concerted adjustment

In addition to promoting interculturalism by means of a statute, a declaration or a policy statement and open secularism through a white paper, the Commission invites the government to encourage interveners to assume greater responsibility in the management of adjustment requests. To this end, the Co-Chairs advocate more extensive training for interveners and reconciliation with respect to harmonization practices.

That being the case, our society also has key social and economic responsibilities. In this spirit, the Co-Chairs have also stressed how important it is for the Québec government to combat the many forms of racism and discrimination found in society.

“We must rightly insist on secularism and interculturalism, but we must adopt vigorous measures to more broadly foster the integration of immigrants and combat discrimination,” Professor Bouchard noted. “Our consultations reveal that members of the ethnic minorities are seeking employment much more than accommodation."

To this end, the Co-Chairs recommend that the government step up measures to accelerate the process of recognizing skills and diplomas acquired abroad. The report contains 37 recommendations covering an array of topics ranging from the wearing of religious signs by government staff to the regionalization of immigration.

“Our recommendations are in keeping with what is commonly called ‘the path that Québec has followed,’ Professor Taylor added. We are proposing neither a break nor a radical shift but only measures to facilitate intercultural relations and the normal development of a pluralist, modern society.”

The Commission

At the request of Premier Jean Charest, the CCPARDC took stock of accommodation practices, conducted a public consultation throughout Québec and examined the attendant questions.

Individuals, groups and associations submitted over 900 briefs and 241 people testified during the 31 days of hearings. All told, 22 regional forums attracted 3 423 participants and over 800 people took part in four province-wide forums. Moreover, 13 research projects conducted by specialists from Québec universities were commissioned and 31 focus groups were organized throughout Québec in which participants came from varied backgrounds.

When it concludes its activities in June, the CCPARDC will have spent $3.7 million of a total budget of $5.1 million. The final report and related documents can be consulted online (
www.accommodements.qc.ca).

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]