Monday, May 11, 2009
Informal letter to the address of Mr. Francis Chartrand, by Gilles Merlot
Saint-Eustache,
April 26 09,
Mister Francis Chartrand
With frankness and honesty that I inform you, on my behalf, Gilles Merlot, a grouping of citizens of Saint-Eustache has taken the lead in organizing a boycott against you, Mr. Francis Chartrand. We prefer that we do not come here, but you have upset many, entering the school, be it 3 years ago or recently.
The boycott will specifically support your department Maxi Saint-Eustache, as well as partnerships in which you are engaged in the public schools of the Commission scolaire de la Seigneurie des Mille-Îles.
We have tried repeatedly to end off your juveniles actions in politics, but in vain, you do to your head. We know that you have obtained several contracts with several schools to hold workshops for information, news, journalism and politics, workshops for social involvement, political and judicial theater workshops and improvisation and recently, workshops medieval role-playing and fantasy.
You presentedyourselfs with the 2006 federal election under the banner of the New Democratic Party in the riding of Rivière-des-Mille-Îles. Shortly after, in the edition of L'Éveil, 13 May 2006 that I have carefully, you are publishing an article saying that the NDP association of Rivière-des-Mille-Îles was against Bill C - 127 which was to raise the age of consent for sexual relations from 14 to 16 years.
In the article, you did mention 2 young students of Polyvalente Deux-Montagnes, every both aged of 15 at the time of publication of the article, while demonstrating a sense of revolt or voluntary detachment face the authority you are appealing: "The sexual consent remains in its own right for many people, a personal decision. The teenager younger than 14 years concludes that the transition between childhood and adolescence, most do not yet possess the maturity required to engage in a such experience. But in fact, after 14 years old they should have the right to practice the experience because, through contact with the education, independence and maturity once evolved, they know what they embark."
"Annie-Joelle Constantin Lortie and Raphaëlle Dubois-Beauchamps, both students at Polyvalente Deux-Montagnes, have the full support of Francis Chartrand, the NDP candidate in the last federal election in Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, which the latter was involved and street worker at the Café de la Paix, Saint-Eustache. He wants to be remembered that inform young people in all honesty and wisdom so that they can flourish in their lives. Raising the age of consent will only launch a message to young people from very authoritarian with a projection as what they are improperly monitored for the remainder of his adolescence and more that some benefit to increasing marginality, already present in our society. He is convinced that young people can manage the issue with responsibility and prefer to benefit young people aware of the hyper-sexualization in the elements of our everyday culture and its cultural products, because there is a plan for the youth of 'today."
You were well written "because there is a plan for the youth of today", because a week later, this article was included in La Presse and Le Journal de Montreal as part of an event in Montreal against the bill, and the following Saturday, May 20 2006, 2 teenage girls, Ms. Constantine-Lortie and Miss Dubois-Beauchamps on your side had declared on air of the Grand Journal de TQS: "We are 15 years old, our breasts and our vaginas, we do whatever we want with." And you had commended the development of their bodies and their sexual development, property acquired and developed over the years, in front of the camera, you, a guy of 23 years old. I was ashamed for you.
Then the months passed, and several other events were held in the Saint-Eustache and Deux-Montagnes, including one in Deux-Montagnes in Olympia Park, where you dared send young show, especially young girls Secondary I to V of the PDM in light attire, from 13 to 17 years, which police Deux-Montagnes told me over the phone. At least you have had the OK from the police to demonstrate. But the girls that you took were cut, my time, very provocative. What message do you send out to voters and for what purpose? Allow even more debauchery in schools? Does it give you more volunteers in the next election by supporting their lawlessness and debauchery?
Then comes the school where the last weekend of August (the first weekend after school starts), 26 and 27 August, when you held another event both Polyvalente Deux-Montagnes that at the Youth Freedom School, where young people have decided to scan in favor of lowering the age of consent for sexual relations from 14 to 13 years, which other sources say it was 12 years or at the beginning of the first secondary cycle.
To the scene to answer questions from journalists following the slippage at the École Liberté-Jeunesse, you said to 4 TV channels: "Today is my hand on a shoulder that I file a generation which is indoctrinated and abused, who lied a false Maternal. Look at them, they know what they do, they know the media, they know their culture, they are not uneducated, and just like me, as intelligent they are, they have Puritanism far in the ass. Exploring sexuality and is practiced at puberty. Not before, not after. So young, to rebellion! Yes, the revolt, the revolution! Yesterday, May 1968, Paris, Brussels, today, August 2006, Deux-Montagnes, Sainte-Marthe!"
And the final nail in June 2007, as in July and August 2006, in Sainte-Marthe-sur-le-lac, always at the École Liberté-Jeunesse, a car wash to fund "extracurricular and juveniles activities" was organized by the Young New Democrats, which was attended by boys and girls between 12 and 17 years in swimsuits and sometimes topless. The goal was (and more, you have admitted in local newspapers) to fund youth conferences and a trip for a demonstration against Bill C-127 to Ottawa in July 2007.
The result: more than 400 young Basses-Laurentides aged 12 to 17 years who have shown for two days on Parliament Hill, distributing political pamphlets taste: "Informaction" "Manifestaction" "Agitaction" "Masturbaction" or even "Profanaction", all with young speedoo in bikini, cargo shorts, with bare chest and even lingerie.
Although it has happened in the rule of art and in compliance, the event "for the right to fuck without any authority from the age of 14 or 13 or 12" has been true for a laughing stock in the face of politicians and MPs, and a real shame for us, people of the region of the Basses-Laurentides. In September 2007, Bill C-127 passed by the Parliament: 237 votes for, 16 against.
It is all very well to show a disagreement about policy or the company, it must be assumed as the company, because charity begins at home itself.
The height of your pride is going to deny your fault in the rejection of your application for the federal election of 2008. You announced by the media shortly before Christmas that you had learned the new through the newspapers on Sunday 16 December 2007, while in January, we learned another new, as what you have been replaced against your will, but that you were informed by telephone by the leadership of the NDP in Quebec, November 22.
The version of January is challenged, even by friends and family, since it is impossible for November 22 to December 16, whether you are aware of your foreclosure without you "climb" in the curtains in all media, proud as you are. Your version of 22 November, and that is what I believe is a phone call from the leadership of the NDP in Quebec you saying that you had internal problems to solve various business in the region of Lower Laurentides in public outings incurred by your colleagues, including in your secular statement.
What about the point of your statement secular, your position on reasonable accommodations, 31 January 2007, while you attack the religious fundamentalists all over the place: Christians, Jews and Muslims. However you attack racism: "But after some requests and complaints from ethnic or religious groups, considered by the media and mass as excessive, intrusive and sometimes against the values and achievements of Quebecers, and which sometimes have struck the freedom of certain individuals, including many groups of women, unconnected with the groups in question, the term "reasonable accommodation" has acquired a pejorative connotation often, sometimes threatening to see some legacies of Quebec."
"We must add that since 2006, the term is abused. Thus, several media have described as a measure of reasonable accommodation that the windows of an exercise room where trained women in tee-shirt and shorts, have been frosted at the request of a group Hassidic Jews."
"Other actions more disturbing, as Sainte-Thérèse, where nurses had to wear long sleeves and long pants in the workplace even during heat waves, as demand from a group of Hassidic Jews in Boisbriand."
"Then some people will recall that in September, in some secondary schools the Basses-Laurentides, a tour of various organizations such as Chastity Quebec, and many fundamentalist groups creating the" isolation "of women in the workplace and in family life."
"And finally the case of a secondary school in Lanaudière will be shocked an entire community in the vicinity of Sainte-Julienne, where the school is in a position of "reasonable accommodation" when asked a serious restructuring the dress code of the school after a religious evangelist whom only 2.4% of students are members, in the flatter excuse to keep the "boys of the community" in the right path of chastity away from the Vice the temptation of the flesh pleasure."
"After all these cases listed, why do we have imposed 95% of the secular population to 5% of religious fundamentalists, whatever the religion, some process changes? Like me, many people will not lock up their wife or their daughters in the wardrobe to the whims of some verses of psalms or whatever religious book."
"We must maintain our tolerance for multiculturalism and diversity, and not fall into the trap of racism and fundamentalism. But the religious fundamentalism in Canada has no place."
Let watch two debates chosen by you in 2006 and 2007, youth sexuality and reasonable accommodations, your pride or self-centered, sex life of children and intolerance of the faith of others. But is not this a valid reason to replace you at your candidate? What interest is there to have a candidate who talks about the sex lives of children and intolerance of the faith of others?
While at the previous election, you were talking about wind energy in a wind corridor from Lachute to Saint-Eustache (he spent 2.3 million in government studies), you talk about fighting local poverty, d 'addition of specialist doctors at the Center Hospitalier Saint-Eustache, to repatriate Canadians soldiers in Afghanistan, to counter the Israeli strikes on Lebanon.
What are you doing today? You go into schools as last year in 2008, using public funds to harangue youth organizing medieval role-playing and fantasy with the New Wars and Quests, whereas last year you go into schools to promote the libertinism and intellectual anarchy again and again using the public funds by sending a bill ranging from $ 68 to $ 125 for one hour workshop teaching and extracurricular activities for my children and my nephews and nieces attend these schools.
You support a radical youth in Quebec and Canada. While some died laughing face of the ambition of your goals, you can still do much to damage within the education system, as to the stability of many families in the region.
Asked repeatedly last year about the destructive consequences and impact of your activities, you do adds to the arrogance of your brand: "If you do not want that I interfere in the education of your children, you n 'had to do it yourself because I have to return back to you to redo all my wishes, my advantage, my ambition. With all that made me suffer and what I lost, I've got nothing to lose and I take every opportunity of life to feed my revenge. Nothing escapes me."
Again on 22 February, the RCMP to let you know that you were indicted for 29 counts of incitement to hatred and religious desecration. Last December, you have taken 3 phone on the radio, in response to the rejection of a complaint by a journalist from Montreal to the Canadian Human Rights Commission following the declaration as an imam who kill women, gays and atheists is not a crime.
Like me, you were mad with rage that the Commission is well and truly treated the journalist as racist and insensitive. In interview with Stéphane Gendron, Benoît Dutrizac and Pierre Maisonneuve, you said this: "Listen, you have a guy, for example, of sound mind, fine, nice, lucid, which has all its head, any health mental balance, what is an atheist, believer or practicing (whatever) and who knows when to stop on the question of religion, the worse is next to an atomic bomb or hydrogen, well this guy is less dangerous than crazy religious fanatic with a submachine gun."
Like your fan club (http://francischartrand-independent.blogspot.com/) and (http://atheisme.ca/), I do not see the desecration of religion, but with all that you represent one side and the other in "I would rather be a fucking lumberjack with a beaver hat than being kneeling in front of the Plateau" you say: "I hoped very much that the 72 virgins Allah offered by the 3 martyrs shot that Julie Surprenant Provencher and Cedric are not there, to be sure to not make a blow job" in response to piracy which he suffered.
Later, you have taken a more violent tone: "It made me think when the sister of one of my colleagues saw Ben Musovsky and Kyle Trudel of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Lachine, and they do not hindered to treat guests in their own house, of "sals racist" , "sals cons suburban" , "Residents of 450 to exterminate" and even "cursed Quebecois against Sharia" , when did the salissage against me even at the doors of former members of the county."
"We tried to scare Quebecers County Rivière-des-Mille-Îles that they were opposed to Sharia, it would be bad for them. "
"It threatens people in their quiet even in August. And these bastards were traced, Ben Musovsky and Kyle Trudel live at Notre-Dame-de-Grâce, Ben is on Monkland while Kyle is on Cavendish."
"Terrorize suburban Quebecers who have worked all their lives of hard work, is the behavior of some New Democrats demagogues kneeling in front of the Plateau, sprinkled a four-five-zero-phobia from Jean Leloup, the select club by Jack Layton and his band of monkeys Islamists, who have guardianship all candidates from the NDP out of Montreal, kneeling before forcibly Yvonne Ridley, a occidentophobe Islamic who conferences which is against our country, against our province, against our cultural heritage, and we must listen, even in Montreal."
"Is there someone willing to take up arms if the pro-life or pro-minorities come to us as the best women in small ads from l'Agence Énergétique du Québec? Because if it ever tries to brainwash in my own living room, I shoot at close range, and too bad if the organizers baveux and anti-Quebec Laoun in Bourassa fags or anti-450 Mulcair in Outremont or lyncheurs of fags Manitoba, it is values, but too bad for those who will be in front of my gun, if I threatened once more in my free peace of homo sapiens square mognon, I draw And I kill."
"Please ignore the words above, they are misogynistic and violent. I was hacked. Hahaha!"
On 25 January on the killings in Belgium: "But finally, when will we understand that a disturbed, it remains disturbed. It is confirmed, the patient in Belgium, had an opening file whose psychiatric 4 times the Crown had asked for a serious réencadrement see internment."
"Well no, must be tolerant of our social deficient, they must be brought into society, we must let them adapt. Here, let it play with your children, he will learn quickly, you see. No, no sir, I assure you it does not re-offend his penis to show to your children, despite the eight rape previously committed by him for 10 years."
"Bullshit, nonsense like this that we are responding in all the NGOs working for the integration of the mentally deficient and social. I grant you, you can not blame these groups to have a little bit of love for our case of "mental health", even me I have compassion for them, and I have always condemned any mental and physical abuse made against them in a psychiatric institute. They are human like us. But we can blame the NGOs, but not widespread, cases of willful blindness, on behalf of integration and tolerance."
"It's beautiful, the diversity of Mr Mrs everyone dancing around the rainbow. That's what it is, tolerance of stupidity, it seems that no official of the tolerance of the diversity of mental illness, had a child or motherfucker stabbed by a "reinstated" in society. I ass full of "socially unfit", worse, I have full ass of those who do not supervise them, and we call in the street, 3 blocks of a school. "
See, still face intolerance ... pedophiles in social reintegration, people in mental health, while you defend access to the "meat" 3 years ago. Things that members of the grouping of citizens of Saint-Eustache do not get, especially when you mention "tolerance of stupidity", while you defend in person 3 years ago that a girl or a boy of 14 years old could have sex, heterosexual or homosexual, with a person ... of 33. Bullshit, nonsense like this that we are responding, when asked what are your beliefs.
Today you are on parole and probation pending your trial. This is unfortunate, but if you had submitted a much better attention and greater wisdom before you do anything with schools and public relations, we would not be made to this degree it dawns on you that a file may Criminal and civil and / or prison.
We are more than a hundred, yes, we have a large impact on benefits to your branch, and we do not want to, but we are parents, and me personally, I have four children 12, 14, 20 and 27 years old and I have 8 nieces and nephews from 2 to 16 years old. They all live in the region of Saint-Eustache, Deux-Montagnes and Ste-Thérèse. I don't want that my children have access to your activities anymore.
On the other hand, we also boycott school activities, extracurricular and educational as you have in the public schools of the Commission scolaire de la Seigneurie des Mille-Îles. We also call to boycott all meetings and rallies all what they are, because we try to educate our children away specimens like you, and we have the support of 2 parents committees.
We will stop the boycott when you get back, stopped your juvenile political indoctrination as well as your role-playing with Eric Sarrazin, who are more or less questionable character field, which also tries to indoctrinate youth.
We apologize for any consequences that this may cause.
Make sure Accept my best regards.
Sincerely,
Gilles Merlot
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Freedom of expression, Gilles Merlot
# posted by Francis Chartrand @ 8:37 AM 
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]