Tuesday, September 30, 2008

 

Quebec - B. Kay et R. Kay and R. Martineau : Mulcair must denounce the fatwas against senseless and Dutrizac Corus network. Pronto!

Journalists are doing to defend freedom of the press! On va les traiter d’islamophobes et de racistes, bien sûr. It will deal with Islamophobia and Racism, of course.

The radio Dutrizac Benedict, and Corus, the owner of the station 98.5 FM, are the latest victims of Jihad legal conducted under a fatwa as weapons of mass destruction against freedom of expression anywhere in the West by Islamic fascism. The saddest is to see the left and our politicians serve as useful idiots in this intimidation and sabotage our hard-won democratic freedoms. Treason! Cowardice! Shameless opportunism!

Two columnists, Barbara Kay in the National Post, and Richard Martineau on the blog of the Journal of Montreal, Mulcair call to denounce these attacks against indecent Dutrizac Benedict for his interview with the NDP candidate Samira Laoun. The interview of Ms. Laoun is available here. And the reaction of Mark on Lebuis Dutrizac the next day is here.

These ridiculous attacks launched for the purpose of intimidation, from the leftist newspaper The Dominion, the Canadian Arab Federation and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (Ontario). See our brief: Quebec - The Canadian Arab Federation, with support from the Canadian Union of Public Employees, is the head of Dutrizac for his interview with Samira Laoun

SOS Racism, by Richard Martineau

The speed with which some agencies shout racism will continue to m'étonner. Soon it will no longer separate the white and color when will our laundry without receiving a complaint from the League of Rights and Freedoms.

Untouchables

Take Benoît Dutrizac.

On 10 September, my former colleague snipers received Samira Laoun, NDP candidate in Bourassa, the issue that animates the airwaves FM talked about Montreal (98.5 FM).

Ex-citizen of Morocco, Mrs. Laoun bears the hijab. She also worked as a Program Manager at Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), a lobby ultrareligieux who has campaigned for Ontario allows the introduction of Shariah courts.

If Dutrizac had received Nicole Charbonneau Barron (conservative candidate who has worked for Opus Dei), it would have raised questions about the Catholic extremism, the anti-abortion lobby, creationism, abstinence, his vision of 'Homosexuality, and so on.

Nobody would protest and, as everyone would have found that the normal host of a public affairs program confronts a member in good standing of Opus Dei deal with extremist positions espoused by that organization.

But Dutrizac had the "cap" to confront Ms. Laoun deal with extremist positions advocated by his former cronies of the CIC.

Result: some groups who say they left (but who are more right than the right) are now asking the head of the facilitator.

ERROR OF ATTACKS

"Mrs. Laouni was attacked by a moderator vicieusement racist, misogynist and Islamophobic," wrote the leftist newspaper The Dominion. "Dutrizac must resign and the CRTC must investigate hate speech and obliged sexist towards the Muslim candidate, asked the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

"The Corus should review its policies on hate speech and provide mandatory training on harassment to all its staff," demanded the Canadian Arab Federation.

Fuck! He does what, Dutrizac, to deserve such attacks? He insulted his guest, he attacked, he forced her to eat ham and spin around a pole on She's Got Legs ZZ Top?

Absolutely not. Benoît Dutrizac questioned Samira Laoun on sharia, he asked whether she was ready to defend gay rights if elected and he said it was unacceptable that ten years girls are forced to wear the veil .

It's racist, right?

Misogynist is telling a woman veiled we find sexy? It is sexist to ask if she had to get permission from her husband before entering politics?

THE SILENCE OF MULCAIR

If Ms. Laouni found this interview so revolting, would you tell me why she spent her time laughing?

And what about Thomas Mulcair, who accompanied Mrs. Laouni? When Dutrizac asked if he was happy with the interview, the NDP has lifted two thumbs up sign of approval. So what is the problem?

I hope that Mr. Mulcair will have the decency to condemn the gratuitous attacks which were launched against Dutrizac.

Otherwise, we will have the strange feeling that defends the right of extremists to restrict freedom of expression.

Translation of excerpts: Barbara Kay, Quebec shock jock is accused by the usual suspects of a hit job on a hijab

Let us not forget that a Catholic candidate, Nicole Charbonneau Barron, was publicly vilified by the Bloc Quebecois leader for his personal views on abortion. You can be assured that if Benedict had the Dutrizac interviewed, he acted as the aggressive questioning on his views on Opus Dei, the prelature "extremist" to which he belongs, on creationism, the Abstinence, if she thought homosexuality was a sin, and everything else. We could hardly imagine that the left or a Catholic went to lay charges of incitement to hatred. Here is yet another excellent example of the excesses of political correctness. The NDP should denounce these attacks, pronto.

Labels: , , ,


Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]