Tuesday, September 21, 2010
At school with escort, by Serge Labrosse

It with escort that the four students at Armand-Frappier, stalked for two weeks by as many suspect, Saint-Constant, need, this morning, going to school.
Parents of teenagers will protect them until the suspects have been neutralized.
"We have no choice," says Lyne St-Denis, the mother of a daughter. They do not dare leave the house."
Let's recall that for two weeks, a group of four people in their twenties, the "Hindu" on board vehicles, relentlessly harassing four young girls aged 14 and 15 on the way to school.
Even weekend
One of the suspects is also more than happy to track down the girls during the weekend.
"On Saturday night, tells Ms. St-Denis, Muna (one victim) called me. She said: Lyne, Lyne, I just see them. They are there on the street!"
"She was on bicycle. She saw the Nissan Sentra Green confronting the guy who was turning towards her."
Muna later recounted having once taken hold of his cell.
Lyne St-Denis: "I told him to come straight home, but she was away on the street Monchamp. We did not take any chances. I went to get my van and we loaded his bike to go home."
Housebound
Needless to say that the four friends do not dare leave their homes.
"My daughter, in any case, she stays at home," says St. Denis.
And since the police board Roussillon seems unable to neutralize the suspect, that it would yet completed or intercepted once or twice, according to witnesses - the parents do not intend to relax their vigilance. Already, they have themselves organized some mills to identify and attempt to intercept the suspects, with the risks that entails.
Meanwhile, it is difficult to know whether the case represents an emergency or not the police of Roussillon.
Detectives indifferent
Definitely not for the public relations service in any cas. Informed in late afternoon on Friday that a report would be published the next day on this subject, the agent Rene Fleury has not seen fit to respond to concerns that the parents had entrusted to the Journal. He did not call back.
In a terse message left on the answering machine of journalist the next day, he explained that he had "not returned [our] urgent appeal on Friday evening because" I was at home, very quiet, having dinner with my friends and my wife ...
One could understand his message after he was not paid to answer calls to the weekend, unless it specifically assigns him the task (that his dispatcher had nevertheless made by sending our call).
In any case, the officer concluded Fleury of-factly: "By Monday, it will have to wait ..."
The Journal has relayed the message to victims, who still fear for their safety.
Link
Labels: Hindu World, Hostile races
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Fear on the way to school, by Serge Labrosse

Four students from École secondaire Armand-Frappier, Saint-Constant, on the South Shore, live in fear. Hoodlums have set their sights on them and worry for two weeks, while openly mocking the police Roussillon.
Alexandra, Veronica, Samantha and Muna are between 14 and 15 years. Students in Secondary III, they live a disturbing return to the school district.
Two weeks ago, boys of twenty years of "Hindu" English-speaking residents who say they LaSalle, began to track the four friends, morning, noon and night.
School officials and police are aware since Monday. But five days later, the suspects still prowling around young girls. Up to their respective homes.
Angry relatives
It was enough to provoke more anger among parents, concerned for the safety of their daughters. Two mothers denounce the situation.
"The police tell us they can not do anything if these guys did not touch our girls," they reported.
As it is clearly stalking, they wonder how they can meet it, considering the safety of girls in danger.
Mothers and daughters understand even less the lack of results of the police service they have provided the authorities with the license plate number, model and color of the main vehicle used to follow them. The young victims have even believe the identity of a rogue, who has previously revived on Facebook.
This is the most surprising is that parents, school teachers and the principal herself, then police have intervened more than once with the suspects, who continue to follow the girls into the school parking lot.
The police have even intercepted twice a vehicle used by the suspects, including a frequently-seen driving did not even have a driver's license in good standing. Inconsequential.
"We should not expect that people will do themselves justice," warns the mother of one victim.
"They expect what, asks Lyne St-Denis, the mother of another. That one of our girls would be attacked? Kidnapped? Raped? They can not even leave their homes unaccompanied. It is necessary that the police act. "
Link
Labels: Hindu World, Hostile races
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Canada - They wanted to convert Native Americans to Islam and the Quebecers inciting genocide

The group of alleged terrorists arrested in Toronto in the summer of 2006 would have had the intention to convert the Quebec Native to Islam, to get them to kill all Quebecers to make the province to First Nations.
This was said the RCMP informant Mubin Shaikh trial of one of 11 defendants in this case. The 20 year old is accused of conspiracy, but it can not be named because of his age at the time of the facts alleged against him.
This allegation of murder conspiracy, even genocidal, against Quebecers is a new element in the case. All targets of the alleged terrorist group identified so far were located in Ontario and the group would have intended to hit the CN Tower, the CBC building, the headquarters of the RCMP and CSIS in Toronto the building of the Canadian Parliament in Ottawa and Pickering.
According to the informant Mubin Shaikh, the alleged leader of the group planned to convert Aboriginal people of Quebec to the Muslim religion, for they killed all Quebecers. The objective of this project would have been to Montreal, Quebec and the rest of the province with First Nations.
Mubin Shaikh said that the alleged conspiracy planned in Ontario and Quebec have been undertaken by importing weapons and bombs purchased from Tamil terrorists who have traveled through Mexico.
The alleged leader of the group had even considered buying a property in Opasatika in northern Ontario, to plan its operations and protect themselves against the forces of order in the event that the group was discovered.
Strategy Defense
The defense seeks to demonstrate that the alleged leader of the group was a visionary who had crazy ideas and who had neither the money nor arms, nor the fighters to carry out all these plots.
The cons-examination of Mubin Shaikh also reveals that the leader was penniless his group believe that the money would eventually come through fundraisers in the Muslim community. To hear the scale of plots incurred by the alleged leader, Mubin Shaikh admitted to the bar he did not know whether to laugh or shake the projects were so ridiculous and improbable. Only the alleged leader believed that his ideas were realistic, "said the witness.
Mubin Shaikh said that the suspected terrorists would be split into two groups because of deep disagreements over how to conduct a holy war in Canada.
The trial continues.
Link
Labels: Arab World, Canada, Hostile races, Islam, Religion and fanaticism, Terrorism
Thursday, February 25, 2010
That's the hell of what are living some very good natural born Quebecers in Chomedey, by Francis Chartrand

A confrontation between dozens of students from high school and St-Maxime Laval police erupted in the early afternoon on the grounds of the school, in Chomedey.
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Hostile races, Laval, Terrorism
Sunday, January 03, 2010
Evidence of impending genocide of the white race, by Francis Chartrand

The City of Montreal ravaged by the scourge of racism. On the verge of hysterics, the municipality adopted an emergency plan.
Seen on several posters in Montreal:
"Advice to young white couples who are thinking about Montreal having children. Contribute to the fight against racism. Sterilize yourselfs and adopt rather small Chinese girls or Haitian boys. We must at anyway, eliminate the white race, responsible for so much misery on Earth.
Besides with the affirmative action programs in education and employment, your kids, yellow, brown or black will have much better chance in life than a white child ontologically racist and whose ancestors who built Quebec the sweat of their brows were vile and despicable beings, colonizers and responsable of Native American genocide. You do not want your child to bear such a burden of shame and guilt in life!
A message from the City of Montreal, in collaboration with SOS Racisme, the Ministry of Families, the Ministry of Immigration and the Ministry of Education, Sport and Recreation."
Well, I have no picture with me, but believe me when I say, people can testify.
Let's make us a gift in 2010; fuck the City of Montreal outside the province of Quebec, we will be able to breathe easier.
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Hostile races, Human mistake, Montréal, Québec
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Barbara Kay, Want to run for political office without scrutiny in Montreal? Just put on a happy face - and a hijab, by Barbara Kay

Montreal's mayoralty race is heating up as the November 1 voting day swiftly approaches. Former separatist militant Louise Harel of the Vision Montréal party, thought to be the front runner over somewhat lacklustre federalist incumbent Gérald Tremblay, is now battling her way back after being forced to jettison her closest collaborator, Benoit Labonté, when credible allegations of Labonté's involvement in contract-linked corruption surfaced last weekend.
Harel should have more than Labonté's dubious character to contend with in the public forum. She should be explaining why a known supporter of Islamist militancy is running for office under her aegis. A certain Najat Boughaba is a candidate for Vision Montreal in the riding of St Léonard West. I met Boughaba two years ago at a fund-raising dinner she organized for the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), where the keynote speaker, notorious Taliban apologist, journalist Yvonne Ridley, spoke glowingly of Hizbollah ("I wish I had the [Hizbollah] flag with me tonight"), officially designated in Canada as a terrorist organization. Boughaba does not deny her deep involvement with the openly Islamist CIC (from which she now discretely distances herself). CIC, readers will remember, was the prime mover in the attempt to sabotage free speech via Human Rights Commission complaints against journalists Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn.
On her website Boughaba claims to adhere to Quebec values of "peace, liberty and equality," but many associations on Boughaba's c.v. contradict such facile lip service to democratic values. For example, Boughaba was an active member of the Centre Communautaire Musulman de Montréal (CCMM). In 2006, following the arrest of 17 alleged terrorists in Toronto (some of them found guilty), Boughaba, under the name of Najad Moustapha, took part in a press conference organized by the CCMM, at which they read a fatwa urging the media to transmit Islam's message of peace drawn up by their spiritual guide, Iraqi ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani who, a few months prior to the conference, had announced on his website that all homosexuals, both male and female, should be executed "in the worst possible manner." (Curiously, the fatwa against male homosexuals was removed from the site, but not the fatwa against females; in any case, the ayatollah has never revoked his condemnation of either.) Moreover, according to Islamist watchdog www.pointdebasculecanada.ca, the CCMM published on its own website a warning to the effect that girls who did not wear the hijab ran the risk of being raped and having "illegitimate children."
Boughaba was also the editor in chief of a Montreal newspaper, Sada Almashrek (Echo of the Orient). This newspaper celebrates the teachings of theocratic totalitarian Ayatollah Khomeini, father of the Iranian Islamist revolution, and regularly publishes paeans to Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Hizbollah. According to www.pointdebasculecanada.ca, a text published under Boughaba's editorial aegis accused Liberal Party deputy Fatima Houda-Pépin, a democratic Muslim, of promoting hatred of Muslims.
Most worrying of all though, it was on Boughaba's editorial watch that a poem was published in her newspaper that attacks the principle of freedom of expression, and which labels "unveiled" heritage Quebec women as "whores." Here is the incriminating excerpt (my translation): "Who gave you the right to speak/to bark like the dogs in the streets, to insult/ to judge and to utter insanities and curses/ this is not freedom of expression/ so stop speaking of democracy/ if you conduct yourself like a tyrant...My hijab is not a handkerchief/ it is my skin/ my modesty, my dignity, my respect/ And if you, old-stock immigrant [woman]/ if you have neither faith nor law/ and you have spent your soiled youth/ passing from one male body to another/ that at least is not the case for me."
You don't need to be a literary critic to deconstruct the contempt for ethnic québécois this poem exudes. And yet the editor who published it - Boughaba - was chosen to go to Hérouxville shortly thereafter to speak about Islamic values and explain to alegedly xenophobic québécois how to get along with the "Other." In an ironic aside, this poem was published days before the famous 2007 Hérouxville lifestyle code was released, yet the "poet," Haydar Moussa, several times publicly declared that the poem had been written "in reaction to" the code, a demonstrable impossibility. And yet the same Haydar Moussa was invited to be a member of the Hérouxville delegation.
To say that Louise Harel did not do her due diligence on Boughaba - or alternatively did, but was so eager to attract a token Muslim to her team as a showcase for her multicultural credentials that she didn't care what it revealed - is the understatement of the year. It goes to show once again that when a hijab goes on one politician's head, objectivity, judgment and democratic principles fall out of all the politicians' heads around it. If you read French, you can get a much fuller account of Najat Boughaba's insalubrious associations and democratic shortcomings here.
Link
Labels: Barbara Kay, Hostile races, Montréal
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Kamal Meddane, the most dangerous young offenders in Quebec, by Marie-Eve Marineau

Kamal Meddane today became the youngest criminal in Quebec, and one of the youngest in Canada to be declared a dangerous offender by a judge, an exceptional sentence, the heaviest in the Criminal Code.
Judge Patrice Hurtubise has made the decision this afternoon in the Youth Division of Montreal. Kamal Meddane was 14 when he committed his first sexual assault. At 16, he relapsed, this time with great violence. At that age he refused an initial therapy for sex offenders. He has refused three in total.
At 17, while on probation followed, he made three new victims. Most of its victims are teenagers from 13 years to fragile tunes chosen at random from a bus or a subway station. He forced one of them watching him masturbate. He has violated another without a condom.
In these last three cases, he pleaded not guilty. After trial, the judge Hurtubise has been convicted of any assault. The Crown, represented by Sylvie Lemieux, then asked the judge to impose an adult sentence, what the judge has consented. This is why in the media he can be identified, even if he committed his crimes while he was still a teenager.
Judge Hurtubise has ordered the imprisonment of Meddane indefinitely. He will serve at least seven years in prison and will be evaluated every two years to determine if he is fit to go out or not.
The young man has a "deviant sexual sadist type," according to psychiatrist Louis Morissette was evaluated at the request of the Crown. He uses violence and humiliation for assaulting teenage and pubescent female. Meddane has no mental illness or drug problem or alcohol. The young man was a dunce at school and refused all approaches proposed for finding a job. It has a "high opinion of himself" and lack of empathy, according to the doctor.
Meddane had been held since his arrest in April 2007. He is awaiting trial in another sexual assault case before an adult court this time. His mother and brother were in the courtroom this afternoon, and one of his victims. His mother collapsed in tears at the sentencing.
See also:
The Crown wants to declare a young offender rapist to be controlled by Christianne Desjardin, (La Presse May 21, 2009)
Excerpt: "It rewarding to me to see that victims might be afraid," he said yesterday. Initially, it was touching. But over time, attacks have increased in severity up to rape. Eldest of eight children, he lived with his family in a five-bedroom in Montreal North.
Link
Labels: Hostile races, Marie-Êve Marineau, Montréal
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Rights groups challenge Iran leader at racism meet, by Francis Chartrand

GENEVA (AFP) — Human rights groups on Sunday challenged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to eliminate severe discrimination in Iran, ahead of his arrival at a UN conference against racism and intolerance in Geneva.
The International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH), the Baha'i International Community (BIC) and the Iranian League for Human Rights (LDDHI) said Ahmadinejad must tackle discrimination against religious and ethnic minorities, women, and halt incitement to hatred.
"By coming to the Durban Review Conference, President Ahmadinejad signals a commitment to the conference's goals of eliminating all forms of discrimination and intolerance," said Diane Ala'i, the BIC's representative at the UN in Geneva.
"His first move on returning home, then, should be to address the severe discrimination and persecution that have flourished under his tenure," she added.
Ahmadinejad is the most prominent head of state scheduled to address the opening of the UN review conference on Monday, which is being boycotted by the United States, Israel, Canada, Australia and the Netherlands.
His virulent anti-Israel statements and comments casting doubt on the Holocaust have prompted fears that his speech could overshadow the primary aim of the conference, to take stock of racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance around the world.
The rights groups said religious discrimination was widespread in Iran, notably affecting Baha'is, Christians, Jews, Sufis, Sunni Muslims, and other minorities, through arbitrary arrests, intimidation and harassment.
They also accused Iranian government-controlled media of fomenting hatred against Bahai's, and warned that repression against activists belonging to ethnic minorities including the Kurds was "rising dramatically".
"Human rights have sharply deteriorated in Iran under the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, as well as against women, are of grave concern," said Karim Lahidji of LDDHI.
The human rights groups called on governments taking part in the conference, as well as the media, to hold Ahmadinejad accountable for violations in Iran.
Link
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Hostile races, Human rights, Iran
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Evil words, by Mario Roy

Montreal proclaiming "zone free of racism," the mayor Gérald Tremblay invites citizens to fight against this scourge by signing a register, hoping to collect 100 000 signatures. How to be against? However, this laudable initiative can be used to identify three trends - and a little disturbing - that occur in our society.
First, make things more difficult, so it remains only to say. This is the first trend: the word is increasingly replacing the gesture.
The classic example is the "act to fight against poverty and social exclusion", adopted by the National Assembly in 2002. It has created an observatory of poverty, an advisory committee on poverty, a requirement to write reports, opinions, recommendations and strategies on poverty ... Why? Because, in fact, fighting poverty is difficult to eliminate completely is impossible. Hence the extraordinary number of words that poverty generates, without effects on reality.
As for the exclusion, it is a word whose meaning has been crushed for the purpose of "stop" the company "excludes", ie who is guilty and should be "condemned." Question, exclude, denounce: we understand the jargon, even if none of these words is used here in its original meaning. This is the second trend: the misuse of words, sometimes to misinterpretation.
In this regard, the media specialists. Advertise in a newspaper said about "taboo" indicates that we fill pages and pages on a phenomenon that everyone is talking about, everywhere, all the time. Denounce (!) A "snapshot" pourfendre is a commonplace that no one uses, or perhaps even knows. The word "media" sensitize "means burial in propaganda to make insensitive. Refer to the "true objectivity" warns the reader that it will be ignored facts.
However, of all evil words, the swelling is most painful is the third trend.
In the light of single words, in fact, it seems clear that our society is the most racist and most misery that mankind has ever known (the most violent and most misogynist too.) However, a Mayor mood officie activist in a country where rampant racism really does not say so: he made the fight, sometimes at risk of losing its skin. And it does not legislate on poverty where the national problem is to be alive the next day.
Beyond a certain critical mass, the words create a virtual universe that has more than a loose connection with the real world.
Thus, in the register of Mayor Tremblay (who, we hope anyway, burdened with the signatures), it would be fair to note a fact without being free from sin, the Montreal-probably among the least racist in the world .
This is already a zone almost free.
mroy@lapresse.ca
Link
Labels: Hostile races, Mario Roy, Montréal
Sunday, December 21, 2008
An Open Letter to Tipping Point and Point de Bascule, by Francis Chartrand

Hello to all the team of Point de Bascule,
I would like to congratulate you to be standing (to congratulate someone for having held a moment imagine), you are an example for the nation and a model for youth and I am not even exaggerating.
First let me introduce myself, Francis Chartrand, former NDP candidate in the district of Rivière-des-Mille-Iles in the 2006 federal election, at the age of 23 years. I say "ex" because it was one year this week, December 16, I had the news in the media (Toronto Star) that I would be more candidate for a second consecutive election. I was removed from my position as candidate along with Micheline Montreuil, in the riding of Quebec.
Following an internal party battle, statements and piracy on my blog, resignations of several of my brothers and sisters as solidarity, based on a petition campaign salissage, I later learned, 6 days later than that was because of my positions on reasonable accommodations, and I asked that the NDP chose to make Canada a secular state and secular at the same time adopting a constitution and secular separating the powers of the state and religions, now not only the state and church, and preventing the integration movement and fundamentalist religious fanatics as lobbyists with the Supreme Court of Canada and as lobbyists religious fundamentalists. While members of several organizations give me their support as Quebecers Lay Movement, the Association of Maghreb Laurentians, and many citizens of Arab origin, Algerian and Moroccan living in the Lower Laurentians themselves, the NDP, they I dealt with racism, Islamophobia and "asshole of 450 to exterminate" and even said to me: "Get Converted to Islam, therefore, try it, this religion, it will not kill you anyway."
It is worth mentioning that all members of the local association of the NDP had been suspended indefinitely from January to August this year because almost all members (98% of the 289 members of Riviere-des-Mille-Iles) had chosen to support me in my struggle when I'm finally show the door by my party last February, which had the effect of "punish" the dissenting members for failing to honor the party, instead of investigating the association and a vote of confidence.
We got wind of this suspension, my team and me, because members had joined the NDP headquarters in Montreal in December of last year and were answering the phone that no statement should be called to newspapers , and argues that they were having made under penalty of suspension of membership cards. Members also were suspended in Argenteuil-Papineau-Mirabel, Marc-Aurele-Fortin, Terrebonne-Blainville, Montcalm, Alfred Pellan, Laval and Laval-Les Iles, probably totaling more than 500 suspensions card members and without notice, until we learn in August.
Then later, in an attempt to introduce myself as an independent candidate in federal elections, which is what me and my team were currently working in my county Rivière-des-Mille-Iles, on the North Shore of Montreal, planes knew that a campaign was salissage good wind in the region. Some "volunteers", obviously from the NDP, because they had a badge of the NDP in the neck, were door to door in Deux-Montagnes, St. Eustatius and Boisbriand.
The point of this campaign salissage was to make me pass me and my colleagues, Christian Barrette, a former candidate for the swearing-in Alfred Pellan, Alexandre Laberge, former secretary in the Association for the NDP riding Riviere-des-Mille-Iles and Anne Humphreys, a former candidate for the swearing-in Marc-Aurele Fortin for racists, xenophobes, the Islamophobic and even anti-Semites. As these volunteers were first tour of some 289 members of the association council, even at home, distributing a pamphlet without photo or image showing that I was racist because I was standing and held firmly against the reasonable accommodation on a religious point of view.
Thereafter, I do not believe my eyes or my ears. For a weekend of August, more than 60 former members had joined my campaign regional committee by telephone that they were intimidated during the door-to-door by 2 "volunteers" from the NDP. They were male, showed a membership of the county of Notre-Dame-de-Grace-Lachine, and do not hindered to treat guests in their own house, "fucking racist" and "fucking suburban people" , "residents of 450 to exterminate" and even of "cursed Quebecois against Sharia", because yes, these volunteers was apparently the promotion of cultural diversity including Sharia.
If they try to save face in their party, they have the right to keep the members they can, but they are in compliance. In election campaign, it is always up to be respectful to a citizen who opens his door, as citizens, voters and even members of the party attached to his home is not affected by our politics, in quite possibly has nothing to sperm washing machine sal cultural groups in Montreal and is entitled to its peacefulness. Those who do not know what this message means, have an interest in releasing the door to door. Did we get involved in the election campaign in Saint-Lambert and Westmount-Saint-Louis? No.
Another point made me jump. What kind of hypocrisy can we have against members or former members of the NDP while volunteers seeking a "support against" against me, or even a renewal of a membership card, or even seek a member to its door to promote cultural diversity including the Sharia, while its membership card is suspended for 7 months out of disciplinary action to seek censorship on the part of members? And they dare call this party, democratic?
The days passed, and came the federal election, where you have hit the electoral team of the NDP candidate in Bourassa, Samira Laoun. Tell yourself that this day, you did my revenge, and I Jubilee joy and relief when you had shown evidence of hate propaganda on the part of Mohamed Elmasry. And what about the statements wise Tarek Fatah, which does not mince words against Jack Layton, Thomas Mulcair, and of course, Yvonne Ridley. As for me, I preferred to put my political career aside, temporarily, the time to take a breath again, after I was operated by the throat and lungs, where does my 4 tumors.
Thank you for you to take my old party, even when I am forbidden to be racist, I was threatened with prosecution. Why, for bitch? NDP: New Democratic Party? No, New disciplinary procedure. (Make sure you crush, say you like it with a forced smile, and shut up!) When a 25-year old, which is a known activist in his community with an impeccable reputation and transparent and that be demolished as the proponents of religious pluralism NDP did, believe me, it eats a slap. But when we realize that our ideas are repeated and repeated by others, such as you at Point de Bascule, it is good for the conscience to know that we are not in the field.
My life takes its breath and lay my struggle continues, and in addition to the fight against poverty which I am at every moment, as well as that for press freedom. I am "politician" and I believe in you. Good work.
Francis Chartrand
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Hostile races, Islam, New Democratic Party, Religion and fanaticism
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Draw me a flag, by Richard Martineau
Journal de Montréal
18/10/2008 06h57

Discussion in the car the other day with one of my daughters. "So you like it, the course of ethics and religious culture?"
-Oh yes, I love it. The teacher is super dynamic ...
-And what are you doing in this course?
-This week, we will redesign the flag of Quebec. The professor said he was more representative of the new reality because there is a cross over. We must create one that would better reflect the Quebec of today ... "
ERASE THE PAST
I am a man open. I think that immigration is an asset. I hope my children will be more informed about other religions and other cultures than I was at their age.
But when I hear things like that (ie we should redesign the Quebec flag on the pretext that it contains, oh sacrilege, a cross), I want to scream.
Yes, we must open ourselves to others. But why this opening should absolutely go through an erasing itself?
We can not and RECEIVE at the same time? We must at all costs j'enlève the family photos that decorate the walls of my room when I get people in my house?
AND THE OTHER?
The Algerian flag and the flag of Turkey contain a crescent representing the path that must travel a Muslim during his life to get to paradise.
The Palestinian flag has a red triangle symbolizes the Hashemite house of Muhammad.
The flag of Israel has a Star of David. The flag of Saudi Arabia is green (color of Islam). The flag of Iraq is flanked by the slogan "Allah Akbar" (God is great). The flag of Afghanistan contains the drawing of a mosque, etc..
Demand there for these people to redesign their flag because he no longer represents the "new reality"?
ENJOY THE DIVERSITY!
Yes, Quebec has changed. Yes, there are people of all religions.
Still, Quebec is still very strong and majority Catholic. When we think in Quebec, is believed to Catholicism, not Islam or Buddhism, hell!
If I say "Italy", you see what you? Couscous or pasta? Priests or imams?
And if I say "Saudi Arabia", what images do you have in mind? Images of churches and cathedrals, or pictures of mosques?
That's not the idea behind the concept of cultural diversity: protect the existence of various cultures throughout the world?
If there is to protect Zulu culture and the pygmies, why could we not also protect Quebec culture?
Unless you tell me it does not exist. It is a big catch-all without identity and it's not worth being preserved ...
THE SHAME OF ITSELF
That's what annoys me gnangnan in multiculturalism: the idea that only other crops worth protected.
That we must stop being so others can feel exist.
The theory that past and future are contradictory, we can embrace both at the same time.
You can not have both branches and roots.
Can not find it absurd you?
Labels: Hostile races, Human mistake, Religion and fanaticism, Richard Martineau
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Quebec - B. Kay et R. Kay and R. Martineau : Mulcair must denounce the fatwas against senseless and Dutrizac Corus network. Pronto!

The radio Dutrizac Benedict, and Corus, the owner of the station 98.5 FM, are the latest victims of Jihad legal conducted under a fatwa as weapons of mass destruction against freedom of expression anywhere in the West by Islamic fascism. The saddest is to see the left and our politicians serve as useful idiots in this intimidation and sabotage our hard-won democratic freedoms. Treason! Cowardice! Shameless opportunism!
Two columnists, Barbara Kay in the National Post, and Richard Martineau on the blog of the Journal of Montreal, Mulcair call to denounce these attacks against indecent Dutrizac Benedict for his interview with the NDP candidate Samira Laoun. The interview of Ms. Laoun is available here. And the reaction of Mark on Lebuis Dutrizac the next day is here.
These ridiculous attacks launched for the purpose of intimidation, from the leftist newspaper The Dominion, the Canadian Arab Federation and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (Ontario). See our brief: Quebec - The Canadian Arab Federation, with support from the Canadian Union of Public Employees, is the head of Dutrizac for his interview with Samira Laoun
SOS Racism, by Richard Martineau
The speed with which some agencies shout racism will continue to m'étonner. Soon it will no longer separate the white and color when will our laundry without receiving a complaint from the League of Rights and Freedoms.
Untouchables
Take Benoît Dutrizac.
On 10 September, my former colleague snipers received Samira Laoun, NDP candidate in Bourassa, the issue that animates the airwaves FM talked about Montreal (98.5 FM).
Ex-citizen of Morocco, Mrs. Laoun bears the hijab. She also worked as a Program Manager at Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), a lobby ultrareligieux who has campaigned for Ontario allows the introduction of Shariah courts.
If Dutrizac had received Nicole Charbonneau Barron (conservative candidate who has worked for Opus Dei), it would have raised questions about the Catholic extremism, the anti-abortion lobby, creationism, abstinence, his vision of 'Homosexuality, and so on.
Nobody would protest and, as everyone would have found that the normal host of a public affairs program confronts a member in good standing of Opus Dei deal with extremist positions espoused by that organization.
But Dutrizac had the "cap" to confront Ms. Laoun deal with extremist positions advocated by his former cronies of the CIC.
Result: some groups who say they left (but who are more right than the right) are now asking the head of the facilitator.
ERROR OF ATTACKS
"Mrs. Laouni was attacked by a moderator vicieusement racist, misogynist and Islamophobic," wrote the leftist newspaper The Dominion. "Dutrizac must resign and the CRTC must investigate hate speech and obliged sexist towards the Muslim candidate, asked the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees.
"The Corus should review its policies on hate speech and provide mandatory training on harassment to all its staff," demanded the Canadian Arab Federation.
Fuck! He does what, Dutrizac, to deserve such attacks? He insulted his guest, he attacked, he forced her to eat ham and spin around a pole on She's Got Legs ZZ Top?
Absolutely not. Benoît Dutrizac questioned Samira Laoun on sharia, he asked whether she was ready to defend gay rights if elected and he said it was unacceptable that ten years girls are forced to wear the veil .
It's racist, right?
Misogynist is telling a woman veiled we find sexy? It is sexist to ask if she had to get permission from her husband before entering politics?
THE SILENCE OF MULCAIR
If Ms. Laouni found this interview so revolting, would you tell me why she spent her time laughing?
And what about Thomas Mulcair, who accompanied Mrs. Laouni? When Dutrizac asked if he was happy with the interview, the NDP has lifted two thumbs up sign of approval. So what is the problem?
I hope that Mr. Mulcair will have the decency to condemn the gratuitous attacks which were launched against Dutrizac.
Otherwise, we will have the strange feeling that defends the right of extremists to restrict freedom of expression.
Translation of excerpts: Barbara Kay, Quebec shock jock is accused by the usual suspects of a hit job on a hijab
Let us not forget that a Catholic candidate, Nicole Charbonneau Barron, was publicly vilified by the Bloc Quebecois leader for his personal views on abortion. You can be assured that if Benedict had the Dutrizac interviewed, he acted as the aggressive questioning on his views on Opus Dei, the prelature "extremist" to which he belongs, on creationism, the Abstinence, if she thought homosexuality was a sin, and everything else. We could hardly imagine that the left or a Catholic went to lay charges of incitement to hatred. Here is yet another excellent example of the excesses of political correctness. The NDP should denounce these attacks, pronto.
Labels: Hostile races, Islam, New Democratic Party, Religion and fanaticism
The dubious friends of the NDP, by Anne Humphreys

Maybe yes, because it was the subject of several articles in the press. Indeed, columnist Lysiane Gagnon is not in the lace Ms. Laoun.
But what you might not know is that the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), an Islamist-minded say ... particular, has already had as vice-president Mrs Laoun! Here are some facts arms Canadian Islamic Congress and Ms. Laoun.

When the controversy surrounding the veil at the time to vote in an election, Ms. Laoun said: "For me, this bill of Quebec, one is political recovery, two, it is a editing, it's controversial, therefore joins political recovery, and three of Islamophobia is because Muslim women who never wear the niqab has never requested." (Téléjournal / Le Point de Radio-Canada, 27 October 2007)
When the controversy over Hérouxville, the ICC has threatened to continue the city if it does not reviewing his famous Charter of reasonable accommodations (Le Soleil, 6 February 2006). Hérouxville is certainly went a little hard, but I defy anyone to tell me what the code of life violated a fundamental right!
ICC considers Hezbollah as a simple resistance group, while this terrorist organization is responsible for pluisieurs attacks against civilians. (Marc Nadeau, blog silent majority in the new, 28 August 2006)
The ICC has made 2006 a list of personalities anti when the name of the president of another Muslim organization included: Tariq Fateh ... who founded his own body to denounce the Muslim fundamentalist imams of several Canadian! (La Presse, 6 August 2006)
A spokesman for the ICC was "happy" not to recognize friends in the list of 17 people arrested on terrorism charges in Toronto. (La Presse, 4 June 2006)
The ICC has called for "boycott" of provincial and federal Liberals when the Ontario government has denied that Islamic law (Sharia) applies to family disputes between Muslims. (Canadian Press, 26 September 2005). Tariq Fateh, the moderately while ago, was found when had interviewed on the subject, that the ICC was "ridiculous"!
The chairman of the ICC considers the head of the Shiite militia in Najaf (Iraq) Moqtada Al-Sadr compares to Joan of Arc. Here is what was said Mohamed Elmasry, the big boss of the ICC: "Listening to mention the young religious leader to his supporters or the media, one can not help but believe that this young man is telling the truth-liberation, peace and justice for his people is his deepest desire. As Jeanne d'Arc, Moqtada Al-Sadr is a soldier and a saint." Note that Salam Elmenyawi, a moderate leader of the community, a giggle and heard that comparison. (La Presse, 19 August 2004)
The ICC has defended the visit to Canada of a radical Sunni imam from Saudi Arabia, Abdul Rahman Al-Sudayyis. To note the curiosity that ultimately he was not allowed to return. (La Presse, 15 May 2004)
Of course, the ICC also participated in various demonstrations in which he saw as an entirely legitimate use by Palestinian suicide bombers against Israeli civilians. (Le Droit, 22 April 2002)
The ICC objected in 2001 to various amendments to the Income Tax Act to crack down against the organizations funding terrorism. (Canadian Press, 29 May 2001)
Let's clarify something: I want to believe that Ms. Laoun is not responsible for all stupidities of the ICC. But if it does not share any of the views mentioned above, she says!
I also want to show you some excerpts of the National Post last Friday, in which the columnist Barbara Kay stake is disturbing facts:
Yvonne Ridley is a victim of Stockholm syndrome who became a radical Islam after his capture in Afghanistan. She has already defended the leader of the Chechen rebels behind the hostage taking in Beslan that killed dozens of children, and in the evening of CIC which she participated, she defended the Taliban regime, attacked the West and promoted the fight Hezbollah.
And it is also a fucking crazy one, but a nasty fucking wild one.
A final extract at least interesting:

Further reading: an excellent site on the tipping point Canada on the NDP and Samira Laouni. Please move from one section to another, and be sure to deepen the subject of the Canadian Islamic Congress with the text.
I will entrust you something: I have nothing against the fact that Ms. Laoun arise, especially since his chances of being elected are slim that a fence niqab. But the public has a right to ask questions about his candidacy and the doubtful it maintains links with Islamic political thought problem! When people will vote for Bourassa in a month, they deserve to know any political opinions that which represents the NDP in their constituency.
I conclude by addressing members of the NDP in the riding of Bourassa: Here is a personalized sign for your riding association ... to you to refute.
Me, when I see and hear people claim to defend my female dignity by spiting on me and treating me as shameless fornication because I lost my virginity since I'm 14 years old, and when Francis is told on the radio because he has "listened Blue Night" in the 90s, it made him a "pervert boy, rapist and unscrupulous", believe me, we want to fucking fight.
Anne Humphreys
Labels: Anne Humphreys, Arab World, Hostile races, Human mistake, Islam
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
The islamolucidity against the inversion of values: fighting spirit of Munich, by Marie-Êve Marineau

The auditors have been entitled to a preemptive lynching without explanation or put in context. For many Quebecers, the extreme right refers to neo-Nazism and fascime. Lépine then tells us that Wilders is one of the most popular politicians in the Netherlands, a country hitherto known for its liberal values left close to those of Quebec. It would have liked to know how a people can suddenly hear an equally dramatic shift towards the extreme right. What happened? Not a word! Nothing. The journalist Lépine, its high moral acknowledge, judge and condemn and asks us to believe on parole.
However, after running Fitna a court in The Hague has dismissed the Federation of Islamic Netherlands requesting an injunction banning the film. The Tribunal held that the right to freedom of expression allowed Wilders to publicly criticize radical Islam and passages of the Koran, and that although it is provocative, the message Wilders is not a call to hatred or violence against Muslims.

Several of us share the concern of objective information released from the straitjacket of the single thought. We seek to understand and we are surprised at just under this chronic lack of depth and probity in the analysis of current events, such as this in the media.
At Radio Canada or in newspapers widely circulated only conformity with generally accepted opinion is tolerated. There is a reason beyond the so-called progressive ideas and anti-that everyone is supposed to feel and convey, we discover a state of mind similar to that which prevailed in the 30 years before the Anschluss and Munich Agreement: The difficulty in admitting the existence of danger.
It must be said that the danger is practical only when it was something very valuable to defend. The Western elites are not aware they have something worthwhile to be protected. For many intellectuals and those who go for such contempt and denigration of our civilization is a mark of intelligence, they boast of being "iconoclasts" as though Western civilization and its values were icons and not the same land where they are rooted! The relativism is really a negation of its own values, it invariably akin to nihilism.
When one wants to deny the validity of a message on throwing stones at the messenger in dealing with racist and Islamophobic, and woe to anyone who dares to draw conclusions practices into line with the seriousness of the message. Ask the danger of Islamism in Leftists and pacifists, they will tell you that the danger comes not from Islam but those sounding the alarm about it, just as pacifists of 1938 for which the danger did not come Hitler, but Churchill!
But the "crime" of those who, like Geert Wilders, lift the veil on the violence of Islam, has an aggravating circumstance, it undermines the naively optimistic ambient and blindness voluntary. To demonstrate that Islam is inherently violent is contrary to the vulgate pacifist. The facts are not enough to absolve those who relate objectively. Describe the reality is in itself a crime, expected that informing people is warn them of danger; strange as it may seem this is the awareness of the threat which is denounced as responsible for the conflict, not threat itself.
The Western newspapers have hung the label "extreme right" on Geert Wilders, while the latter defends liberal values threatened by Islam: freedom of expression, gender equality, democracy, secularism, non-violence, gay rights etc. . Is this ignorance or misinformation? For some it is the pathological lack of curiosity, they repeat a good parrots what other newspapers have written. For others it is simply the well will be adopted to discredit a politician who showed a rare courage in denouncing extremism and violence. The media are seeking to destroy a person who risks his life to defend the kind of society without which these same media could not survive!
To reduce someone to silence or discredit it suffices to accuse, without the slightest evidence of racism or Islamophobia. He hangs a "yellow star" to better insulate the rest of the citizens and to muzzle anyone who might be tempted to approve it aloud. The process is very convenient, the accusers are not required to provide evidence and their victims are automatically stripped of their rights. In the case of Mark Steyn and magazine Maclean the presumption of innocence, the right to be heard, the right to make full answer and defence have been trampled upon by the very people (the Committee for Human Rights) who were supposed to promote them.
We are witnessing here in a strange alliance, that of the far-right Islamist and somehow left that has lost its bearings. The hatred of the West gives his hand to the self-hatred: tactical alliance with Islamic alliance but suicidal for the left. When our worst enemy becomes our main ally to submit our partner there is a problem.
And we do will come out not so collectively we refuse to admit that there is problem. To cure it is necessary above all else s'avouer ill and put away the habits and behaviours that exacerbate the disease. The Quebec society must take note of the dangers that Islam poses to all citizens. This ideology of extreme right violently opposed to democracy, freedoms and human rights, it attacks the rule of law that seeks to distort and to submit. For islamolucides the challenge is enormous, objectively inform people using its best, their intelligence their judgement and their sense of values.
Labels: Hostile races, Islam, Marie-Êve Marineau, Religion and fanaticism
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]