Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Attempt to Break New Irish Blasphemy Law, by Francis Chartrand
Last Friday morning in Ireland, about 30 minutes after a new law took effect with the new year that makes blasphemy a crime punishable by a fine of up to $35,000, a group of Irish atheists invited the government to prosecute them by publishing 25 blasphemous statements on an Irish Web site.
As The Lede explained last July — when the bill was signed by Ireland’s president, Mary McAleese — even though Ireland’s Constitution calls blasphemy a criminal act, the police force had no legal means to prosecute blasphemers.
According to the updated Irish Statute Book, the criminal blasphemer is defined as someone who “publishes or utters matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion, and … intends, by the publication or utterance of the matter concerned, to cause such outrage.”
On the Web site Blasphemy.ie, Michael Nugent, a writer and co-founder of Atheist Ireland, wrote that his group was trying hard to break the new law because it is “both silly and dangerous.” Mr. Nugent explained:
It is silly because medieval religious laws have no place in a modern secular republic, where the criminal law should protect people and not ideas. And it is dangerous because it incentives religious outrage, and because Islamic states led by Pakistan are already using the wording of this Irish law to promote new blasphemy laws at U.N. level.
Given that the law explicitly states that the intention of the blasphemer has to be to cause outrage, it is not clear if the Irish atheists have really succeeded in breaking it. The 25 statements published on Blasphemy.ie are largely inoffensive quotes from people like Jesus, Mark Twain and a fictional character in Monty Python’s “Life of Brian” that are unlikely to ever fill the streets of Dublin with enraged protesters.
What makes the Irish group’s attempt to break the law seem particularly tame is that it came on the same day last week that an axe-wielding man in Denmark tried to attack a cartoonist who offended millions of Muslims by publishing a drawing thought to show the Prophet Muhammad with a bomb in his turban. Say what you will about the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which intentionally published 12 cartoons mocking Islam in 2005, but that publication certainly showed how to cause the kind of outrage described in Ireland’s new law.
If the Irish atheists had wanted to make sure that they were breaking Ireland’s new law, they could simply have republished those cartoons, as the blogger Andrew Sullivan did last week in response to the attack on the cartoonist.
Indeed, some observers in Ireland, noting that the country’s Christian leaders made no public request for the legal prohibition on blasphemy to be made enforceable, have guessed that the government may have been acting mainly to restrain any Irish publisher from following the lead of the conservative Danish paper in offending Muslim sensibilities. David Quinn, a former editor of a Catholic newspaper in Ireland, told NPR that the new Irish law may have been introduced not to placate Ireland’s Christian majority, but because “there was a fear that we might get a Danish cartoon-style controversy in Ireland — that some newspaper might publish something that Muslims found highly offensive — and it might have repercussions for Irish trade in the Muslim world.”
Link
Labels: Atheism, Francis Chartrand, Ireland, Religion and fanaticism
Security Theater Now Playing at Your Airport, by Daniel Pipes
As hands are wrung in the aftermath of the near-tragedy on a Northwest Airlines flight approaching Detroit, a conversation from London's Heathrow airport in 1986 comes to mind.
It consisted of an El Al security agent quizzing one Ann-Marie Doreen Murphy, a 32-year-old recent arrival in London from Sallynoggin, Ireland. While working as a chambermaid at the Hilton Hotel on Park Lane Murphy met Nizar al-Hindawi, a far-leftist Palestinian who impregnated her. After instructing her to "get rid of the thing," he abruptly changed his tune and insisted on immediate marriage in "the Holy Land." He also insisted on their traveling separately.
Murphy, later described by the prosecutor as a "simple, unsophisticated Irish lass and a Catholic," accepted unquestioningly Hindawi's arrangements for her to fly to Israel on El Al on April 17. She also accepted a wheeled suitcase with, unbeknown to her, a false bottom containing nearly 2 kilograms of Semtex, a powerful plastic explosive, and she agreed to be coached by him to answer questions posed by airport security.
Murphy successfully passed through the standard Heathrow security inspection and reached the gate with her bag, where an El Al agent questioned her. As reconstructed by Neil C. Livingstone and David Halevy in Washingtonian magazine, he started by asking whether she had packed her bags herself. She replied in the negative. Then:
"What is the purpose of your trip to Israel?" Recalling Hindawi's instructions, Murphy answered, "For a vacation."
"Are you married, Miss Murphy?" "No."
"Traveling alone?" "Yes."
"Is this your first trip abroad?" "Yes."
"Do you have relatives in Israel?" "No."
"Are you going to meet someone in Israel?" "No."
"Has your vacation been planned for a long time?" "No."
"Where will you stay while you're in Israel?" "The Tel Aviv Hilton."
"How much money do you have with you?" "Fifty pounds." The Hilton at that time costing at least £70 a night, he asked:
"Do you have a credit card?" "Oh, yes," she replied, showing him an ID for cashing checks.
That did it, and the agent sent her bag for additional inspection, where the bombing apparatus was discovered.
Had El Al followed the usual Western security procedures, 375 lives would surely have been lost somewhere over Austria. The bombing plot came to light, in other words, through a non-technical intervention, relying on conversation, perception, common sense, and (yes) profiling. The agent focused on the passenger, not the weaponry. Israeli counterterrorism takes passengers' identities into account; accordingly, Arabs endure an especially tough inspection. "In Israel, security comes first," David Harris of the American Jewish Committee explains.
Obvious as this sounds, overconfidence, political correctness, and legal liability render such an approach impossible anywhere else in the West. In the United States, for example, one month after 9/11, the Department of Transportation issued guidelines forbidding its personnel from generalizing "about the propensity of members of any racial, ethnic, religious, or national origin group to engage in unlawful activity." (Wear a hijab, I semi-jokingly advise women wanting to avoid secondary screening at airport security.)
Worse yet, consider the panicky Mickey-Mouse, and embarrassing steps the U.S. Transportation Security Administration implemented hours after the Detroit bombing attempt: no crew announcements "concerning flight path or position over cities or landmarks," and disabling all passenger communications services. During a flight's final hour, passengers may not stand up, access carry-on baggage, nor "have any blankets, pillows, or personal belongings on the lap."
Some crews went yet further, keeping cabin lights on throughout the night while turning off the in-flight entertainment, prohibiting all electronic devices, and, during the final hour, requiring passengers to keep hands visible and neither eat nor drink. Things got so bad, the Associated Press reports, "A demand by one attendant that no one could read anything … elicited gasps of disbelief and howls of laughter."
Widely criticized for these Clouseau-like measures, TSA eventually decided to add "enhanced screening" for travelers passing through or originating from fourteen "countries of interest" – as though one's choice of departure airport indicates a propensity for suicide bombing.
The TSA engages in "security theater" – bumbling pretend-steps that treat all passengers equally rather than risk offending anyone by focusing, say, on religion. The alternative approach is Israelification, defined by Toronto's Star newspaper as "a system that protects life and limb without annoying you to death."
Which do we want – theatrics or safety?
Mr. Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum and Taube fellow at the Hoover Institution, has super-elite status at two airlines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. 6, 2010 update: I lacked space in the column to play out this ultimate scenario: What if a very large group of hijackers gets on a plane, enough of them so that with muscle alone – no knives, guns, or bombs – they overpower the passengers and crew? What if they threaten the pilots to strangle one person after another until the plane comes under their control? No amount of technology can prevent such a scenario; only scrutiny of who is getting aboard can do so.
And while there has been no such large group, "Those Fourteen Syrians on Northwest Airlines Flight #327" represented a possible step in that direction.
Jan. 17, 2010 update: As the anecdote concerning Ann-Marie Murphy implies, I am not calling for religious profiling so much as using one's brains to focus on the threat. Therefore, while I see the following news from Finland, "Passengers' Religion May Lead to X-Ray Scan," as a step in the right direction, I also see it as simplistic:
Airport security may soon start scanning travellers based on their religion or citizenship. A syndicate of regional papers reports that a policy of passenger profiling may be adopted if Finland begins using new -- and controversial -- electromagnetic scanners.
Finland's aviation authority Finavia is considering whether to invest in electromagnetic scanners. But their bulky size and prohibitive expense means they would not entirely replace standard metal detectors. This is why, explains Finavia's head of corporate security Jyri Vikström, they may use passenger profiling in addition to random scans. .
Comment: How curious if the cost of electromagnetic scanners is what prompts a more discerning approach to airport security. And Finland - not the place one would expect such a cutting-edge decision, given its relative lack of terrrorism.
Link
Labels: Daniel Pipes, Israel, Terrorism
Sunday, January 03, 2010
Barbara Kay: Quebec's new state religion -- cultural relativism, by Barbara Kay
In September 2008, after years of pre-planning by elites without public consultation, Quebec’s Ministry of Education established a province-wide, compulsory pedagogical program called Éthique et Culture Religieuse (ÉCR).
All Quebec students — public, private, even the homeschooled — must take ÉCR (with the exception of one secondary school year) from age six through high school.
On its sunny face, the ÉCR program introduces students to the rich variety of religious beliefs and rituals in today’s “intercultural” Quebec, where all citizens “live together in the bosom of a Quebec [that is] democratic and open to the world.”
But a newly landed bombshell amongst Quebec’s chattering classes, a study produced by Ethnic Studies Phd candidate Joëlle Quérin for the Institut de Recherche sur le Québec, persuasively argues that the ideology behind the course is anything but benign, reinforcing concerns about this troubling program I expressed in these pages last December.
Following a close analysis of the course’s stated objectives, content, teachers’ roles and suggested activities, Quérin pulls no punches in her conclusion: “I wanted to verify if the course gives knowledge to children or if it indoctrinates them. I observed that it was the second alternative that prevailed.”
Two values dominate the program’s objectives: learning to “vivre ensemble” (live together) and arriving at the “bien commun” (the common good). How does ÉCR produce social harmony? By constant “dialogue” and “recognition” of other cultures, which can only be accomplished, in the words of ÉCR mandarin Georges Leroux, by inculcating in children “absolute respect for every religious position.”
But according to ÉCR, “every religious position” includes pagan animism, witchcraft (Wiccans “are women like any other in daily life”), and the nutbar Raëlian Movement (“technologically, [the Raëlians are 25,000 years in advance of us”). To bundle superstitions and cults together with authentic religions, then demand deference to all, is to discourage actual respect for any but the state religion of “normative pluralism,” the real aim of the program.
In its indifference to objective knowledge, in its crusade to hallow cultural relativism and a strictly Charter-of-rights based identity, ÉCR stimulates heritage students’ detachment from their own cultural touchstones, and chills critical thinking in all students.
Quérin cites, for example, one instance where students were invited to redesign the Quebec flag, replacing the cross with a more “inclusive” symbol, and another, an activity called “Youpi! Ma religion à moi!” (my own religion!) in which religions actually invented by students are accorded the same esteem as real ones. Such subversive pedagogical impulses dismissively mock Quebec’s unique culture, based, like all others, in a shared language, religion and collective values formed over time.
In the ÉCR scheme, teachers do not actually convey knowledge, but rather “plan, organize activities, advise, accompany, encourage, support … make suggestions, but never impose.”
But they must and do “impose” sometimes. The program harps relentlessly on “dialogue” as the principal vehicle for learning to “vivre ensemble.” But if, according to an editing team spokesman, the dialogue does not follow a politically correct script — that is, if students of independent mind or critical point of view diverge in behaviour or words from the prescribed “recognition” mantra: all cultural traditions are equal; all beliefs are good — “The teacher must intervene immediately to stop it on the spot. Any attack in class on the dignity of the person or the common good must be immediately denounced, because it is not tolerated in our society. In that [respect], the program of Ethical and Religious Culture is not neutral.”Thus Quérin darkly warns: “After having followed the ÉCR course for 10 years, the students won’t have a great knowledge of religions, but one thing is sure: no [cultural] accommodation will seem unreasonable to them.”
A May 2009 Léger marketing poll on ÉCR found that 76% of québécois prefer a choice in religious education; they think their elites have shown contempt for the population. Many parents are demanding ÉCR exemptions, if not outright abolition of the program. Grassroots resistance movements — strange bedfellows of anti-clericalists, practicing Catholics and nationalists, each with their own support network — are pushing back through political activism, the media and the courts.
As well they should. ÉCR is a creepy state foray into social engineering. Disguised as multicultural feel-goodism, the program is in reality the utopian Quebec Left’s strategic plan for societal transformation. Their tactics: the appropriation of parents’ natural and rightful authority over their children’s religious upbringing; the willful erosion of children’s pride in their Quebec patrimony; and the slow suffocation of students’ inherent curiosity and intellectual autonomy.
If Quebec does not wish to end up in the sick ward of western cultures, ÉCR must be excised in the operating theatre of popular resistance.
Link
Labels: Barbara Kay, Education, Québec
Detroit terror attack: A murderous ideology tolerated for too long, by Noémie Cournoyer
Friday's attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner by a British-educated Islamist was foiled by the bravery of its passengers and crew. We cannot assume that we will be lucky next time. And the indications are that there will be a next time.
According to police sources, 25 British-born Muslims are currently in Yemen being trained in the art of bombing planes. But most of these terrorists did not acquire their crazed beliefs in the Islamic world: they were indoctrinated in Britain. Indeed, thousands of young British Muslims support the use of violence to further the Islamist cause – and this despite millions of pounds poured by the Government into projects designed to prevent Islamic extremism.
Is it time for a fundamental rethink of Britain's attitude towards domestic Islamism? Consider this analogy. Suppose that, in several London universities, Right‑wing student societies were allowed to invite neo-Nazi speakers to address teenagers. Meanwhile, churches in poor white neighbourhoods handed over their pulpits to Jew-hating admirers of Adolf Hitler, called for the execution of homosexuals, preached the intellectual inferiority of women, and blessed the murder of civilians. What would the Government do? It would bring the full might of the criminal law against activists indoctrinating young Britons with an inhuman Nazi ideology – and the authorities that let them. Any public servants complicit in this evil would be hounded from their jobs.
Jihadist Islamism is also a murderous ideology, comparable to Nazism in many respects. The British public realises this; so do the intelligence services. Yet because it arises out of a worldwide religion – most of whose followers are peaceful – politicians and the public sector shrink from treating its ideologues as criminal supporters of violence. Instead, the Government throws vast sums of money at the Muslim community in order to ensure that what is effectively a civil war between extremists and moderates is won by the latter. This policy – supported by all the main political parties – does not seem to be working. The authorities, lacking specialist knowledge, sometimes turn for advice to "moderate" Muslims who have extreme sympathies; supporters of al-Qaeda are paid to disseminate their ideology to young people.
Radical Islamist leaders are not stupid: they know how to play this system. The indoctrination of students carries on under the noses of public servants who are terrified of being labelled Islamophobic or racist. Therefore they fail to do their duty, which is to protect Muslims and non-Muslims alike from a terrorist ideology. If providing that protection requires fewer "consultations" with "community leaders" and more arrests, then so be it.
Link
Labels: Detroit, Noémie Cournoyer, Religion and fanaticism, Terrorism, United Kingdom, United States
Canada is hosting an organization that glorifies jihad and recruiting for terrorist organizations, by Iba Bouramine
All these years of cultural relativism, of accommodation and political correctness on radical Islam Canadian bear fruit. By dint of imagining that all the radicals are equal, we focus on the wrong targets. Radical Islam is rising and we do not even need to look to find them, they appear! One of the most radical movements of the Islamic world, Hizb ut-Tahrir has just moved openly in Canada. This movement is a kind of conduit for organizations like al Qaeda. He plays the role of agency recruitment and training for organizations Terros which themselves apply jihad in its most violent and also seeks, among other things, terrorism to advance the cause. For decades the Hizb ut-Tahrir acted secretly in the United States, organizing meetings and conferences under the name of organizations-screens. But things have changed. He became more rebellious and do more cache to spread its ideas in North America.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international movement which has the goal of restoring an Islamic state or caliphate-world - which encourages Muslims to support jihad. Its particularity is to provide resources to terrorism. The movement recruited and indoctrinated individuals unstable then we find in organizations 'act' like al-Qaida. One of these former members is Kahlid Sheikh Mohammad, an organizer of the attacks of September 11. There was also Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Hambali, head of Jemaa Islamiya terrorist group and Asif Muhammad Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif recruited by Hamas to carry out attacks in Tel Aviv.
Hizb ut-Tahrir was founded in 1952 by Sheikh Yaqiuddin Al-Nabhan, a man whose worldview was shaped by the Muslim Brotherhood, but found that the Brotherhood had become too moderate! After participating in the coup that failed in Egypt and Jordan, the Hizb ut-Tahrir was considered so radical it was banned throughout the Middle East. He then moved to Europe and after the fall of communism, it has spread in Central Asia.
It is difficult to estimate the number of its members. He certainly has grown since the attacks of September 11, said Madeleine Gruen, a principal analyst for the NEFA Foundation. In 2003 it was estimated that the movement had ten to one hundred thousand members worldwide. Today, this movement, active in forty countries, nearly one hundred thousand members not only in Indonesia and "several hundreds of thousands" in the world, according to Mrs. Gruen.
In the U.S., Hizb ut-Tahrir were hundreds of members. His ideology is a mixture of orthodox Islam, Marxism-Leninism, anti-Semitism and opposition to liberal democracies. Even if it arises in non-violent movement, the Hizb ut-Tahrir advocates, "the same vision and goals that al-Qaida," according to experts like Madeleine Gruen observes that the Hizb ut-Tahrir expands recruitment activities on a much broader basis.
Even if he does not organize terrorist acts, Hizb ut-Tahrir glorifies jihad and accuses of terrorist organizations like Hamas do not be so hard on Israel. In a brochure posted on its website July 1, the organization said that if the caliphate there, all of Palestine "would be cleared of occupants Jews" and brought "into the fold of the Islamic state."
HTA is also obsessed with the alleged nefarious U.S., President Obama and the capitalist system. This can be seen casting a glance at the titles of articles posted on its website.
The spokesman of Hizb ut-Tahrir emphasize that their organization is not engaged in terrorist activities and affirmed that the United States and Paskistan want to delete because they fear his fight for justice for Muslims .
Bullshit meet the criticisms. "Freedom and justice sought by hypertension can be achieved by violence, as it is to overthrow democracies." This was particularly backed the director of Center for Eurasian Policy Hudson Institute. Zeyno Baran.
Testifying before a Senate committee, Baran said: "It is unlikely that the Hisz ut-Tahrir is involved in terrorism. The terrorist action is not part of its mission. But this movement serves as training camps ideological and political Islamists. I have described as "a conveyor belt to terrorism".
Link
Labels: Canada, Iba Bouramine, Islam, Ontario, Pakistan, Religion and fanaticism, United States
Arab world - President of the European Parliament accused of racism by liberal Arab website, by Francis Chartrand
During his visit of December 20, 2009 in Oman, the President of European Parliament Hans-Gert Poettering said that democracy in the Middle East evolved from within, it must reflect the traditions and local values and that the West should not exert pressure on countries in the region for them to accept a democratic system of European style. This statement has raised the criticism of Arab intellectuals and the next day, Omran Salman, Director of Arab Reform Aafaq.org site, published an article castigating statements Poettering.
Western officials prefer to preserve the Western dictatorships
"(...) What do statements [like Poettering]? That the European democratic system is suitable for all kinds of countries around the world, but not to Arab countries?
Such statements are obviously not harmless, and they do not serve these alleged exceptions [Arab] and they would rather the manifestation of racist tendencies and selfish goals.
These people [the attitude Poettering] believe that the Arabs deserve nothing better than their current government, they do not deserve democracy enjoyed by civilized nations. It follows that it is better not to put pressure on the dictatorial regimes, but rather to fulfill their wishes, [and receive] in exchange agreements, money and profits, while people may well go devil.
In reality, the president of the European Parliament, who should be ashamed, is not the only villain of this batch [of Western statesmen]. Unfortunately, many European officials and Americans share his views, some even competing to turn a new page [in their relations with] the dictatorial governments, that of [Syrian President] Bashar Assad or [Libyan leader Moammar] Gaddafi or more.
Their positions are based on the following assumptions:
- People are not equal in their ways to achieve democracy, there would be nations first class and second class nations. The "first class" - Europe and the West - deserve the highest level of democracy, while Arab nations belong to the second class are [intrinsically] different constraints to accept the authority of their governments [ respectively].
- The best way to defend Western interests is to preserve the existence of tyrannical regimes and not to provide [these] nations can adopt democracy as such a change could affect those interests [Western].
- The democratic experience is inherently scalable, so it is not useful to promote and facilitate [the way] to democracy, particularly in Arab countries. This however is not true for Eastern Europe, South America or Asia [where democracy was introduced quickly].
- All nations of the region have their own characteristics and cultural traditions, which must be respected and this would be a mistake to impose democracy or push them to adopt [democracy].
As I said before, these are only excuses advanced by some Western politicians to justify their relationship with the corrupt and tyrannical governments in the Arab world. They reveal their contempt for the nations of the region, treated as inferior species.
The Arab people also want freedom and democracy
The truth is - even if these opportunistic [Western] does not see things eye to this - that all nations have also [right] to freedom and democracy. There is no nation that can fight and not fighting for freedom - and the Arab nations are no exception.
Moreover, democracy is not a habit that one has for honoring its traditions, or that it adapts to the climate. It is a universal human value that transcends continents and cultures.
The supremacy of law, a government elected by the people, accountable to [its people], the separation of powers, pluralism, the transfer of power by peaceful means, all these things are not dependent on regional customs . If they are good for the West, they are also the East and all regions of the world whatsoever.
The only thing left to say is that all the Reformers, those who defend democracy and freedom in Arab countries should condemn racism and opportunism of politicians like - the President of the European Parliament included (...)
Link
Labels: Arab World, Europe, Francis Chartrand, Oman
Evidence of impending genocide of the white race, by Francis Chartrand
The City of Montreal ravaged by the scourge of racism. On the verge of hysterics, the municipality adopted an emergency plan.
Seen on several posters in Montreal:
"Advice to young white couples who are thinking about Montreal having children. Contribute to the fight against racism. Sterilize yourselfs and adopt rather small Chinese girls or Haitian boys. We must at anyway, eliminate the white race, responsible for so much misery on Earth.
Besides with the affirmative action programs in education and employment, your kids, yellow, brown or black will have much better chance in life than a white child ontologically racist and whose ancestors who built Quebec the sweat of their brows were vile and despicable beings, colonizers and responsable of Native American genocide. You do not want your child to bear such a burden of shame and guilt in life!
A message from the City of Montreal, in collaboration with SOS Racisme, the Ministry of Families, the Ministry of Immigration and the Ministry of Education, Sport and Recreation."
Well, I have no picture with me, but believe me when I say, people can testify.
Let's make us a gift in 2010; fuck the City of Montreal outside the province of Quebec, we will be able to breathe easier.
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Hostile races, Human mistake, Montréal, Québec
Open Letter to Richard Martineau, by Francis Chartrand
Hello Mr. Martineau
I send you this comment after your column last Saturday December 18th "Meanwhile, in the PQ". I am a blogger and a few times. I publish some of your columns that I appreciate. I'd be lying if I say that you did not your politics. Continue to disturb. I like that.
I appeared in federal elections in January 2006 for the NDP in Rivière-des-Mille-Îles. But December 16, 2007, when they were preparing to prepare for the federal elections of 2008, I learned through the newspapers (Toronto by the way) I was cursed out together with Micheline Montreuil.
Why? It took me time to learn, but the reason for my ouster was because I was against the reasonable religious accommodations. Despite the claims of certain cultural communities, they called me a racist, fascist bastard, and some members of the NDP had said that my mother should had an abortion instead of giving me life.
Instead of staying with those partisans while kissing their fucking ass while they vomited on me and my supporters, I took an independent position, where I became a fervent supporter secular fighting religious fanaticism as I can . I moved from left to right, somehow. And I prefer doing that too much to do anything.
I was recently called intolerant, as sometimes people are treated and piss in their pants. When it comes to qualifying I thank the people from my heart, because I do not tolerate the idiocy of S'A flat belly in bullshit, that cultural communities themselves condemn. Am I a racist? If yes, too bad for you, good for me, my skin is not free, and it will make total war for my skin.
A few weeks ago, you asked if there was someone, somewhere close to get a secular political party, although I rode a horse, and started to raise awareness more than 450 children, only in 2009 in Two Mountains and St. Eustatius in my basement of Two Mountains against the evils of multiculturalism and tolerance of other religion. I do not teach them that they are superior as whites but they are not inferior as a visible majority.
I also inform parents of various misdeeds during the RCT as a tactic to make us slaves as whites. I teach them to tolerate as much that we (Quebec strain) are tolerated in our fair value. Many blacks have attended my identity workshops, they were "born again", they became atheists.
That's what I do, and I do it with passion. Instead of the multiculturalists re-educate our children in Quebec, I even to teach Muslim veil hanging in the wardrobe, and I even teach the guitar. So we have in Saint-Eustache some sexy and beautiful Moroccan teenage girls unveiled, who play Paul Piché drinking alcohol on St. John, some sexy and beautiful Algerian teenage girls unveiled, who play April Wine on Canada Day in very short denim shorts.
My girlfriend and I, we have the same passion, we unmulticulturalise, and we love it. And we are aware that culture and religion is not the same thing.
But a tragedy happened at 2 weeks of Christmas. A mother contacted me from Boisbriand December 14. She authorized me to publish his name on the net as well as newspapers, Marie-Claude Langlois, 32. Her 9 year old girl has been chosen by his teacher (they have derived its name from a random pot inscribing his name on a piece of paper) to an activity during the RCT. This activity is to convert to Islam. An imam was waiting in the hallway of the school and was converted (the confession she was serious, only he knows) the girl in question. The teacher wanted her students to impose the Islamic faith without talking to the mother or her spouse.
When she returned home, she wore the hijab. An imam is supposed to come home on Wednesday to convert them (forcibly?), without their consent. She contacted the teacher in question and she said that this experience was for a period of 4 months, as what she will became back Catholic later. The school sells them as a family to Islam. They said that if she ever dared to remove her daughter from this project, the DPJ was intervening. What a great achievement that the RCT course!
One of my friends, Mathieu Arnaud was at Ahuntsic Park on the sidewalk I was talking hockey with one of his buddies. Disappointed by the performance of Carey Price, he released a coronation, a simple "Osti".
A Muslim with a long black beard in his fifties, sitting on a park bench not far away stood up and went to complain to a police patrol was nearby.
The police has arrested, they stopped walking if they don't want be shot. The police immediately called their papers, and issued a ticket for having issued a coronation or blasphemy or foul language; $ 75 each.
They have however said they were 2 students from Cégep Ahuntsic, 2 consenting adults, talking about the game of hockey before, the Muslim has dealt with "miscreants" to "mangy dog", to "Canadians badly educated" the policewoman gave him reason, but Matthew and his friend had no right to say softly: "Osti que la game était plate".
Meanwhile, while the policewoman had their backs turned to her 4 cars, 2 blacks were exchanged for drugs. Mathieu said what happens, she deals with racism, and gave him another ticket for racist remarks. The Muslim, meanwhile, asked why we Quebecers, whenever we see members of streets, shouting that is drug trade.
What a jerk!
Of course they will deny, and they went to SOS Ticket. If they should ever go to court, their families will support them.
Mathieu has Rouyn-Noranda. La police chez lui n'écoeure pas personne, pas plus que les immigrés. Police ever there is not shooting shit on nobody, even not immigrants. Why all those in Montreal who are white, they are treated worse than dogs on a leash? True, Richard, what have we did to God, Buddha, Allah, Krishna, Jehovah, etc..?
He still have a session at College Ahuntsic. After that he went to study at UQAB (University of Quebec in Abitibi Témiscamingue).
Without doubt, and unfortunately for some Montrealers (25% of the people he has known here) which were fun, he never wants to come back here. The remaining 75% were treated for almost 2 years as a resident, a peasant or a nasty racist.
Injury, like him, I thought Montreal was civilized.
A 13 year old at École Liberté-Jeunesse, at Ste-Marthe-sur-le-lac, a teenager which I teach English-speaking Canada music, has been withholding because of a Muslim substitute. While it is a free period during the course of science, he made a drawing class in the solar system, and combines planets to professors he jokes.
He combines Saturn and Jupiter to 2 corpulent teachers, Venus to a lovely teacher of 23 years old, but Pluto, to the Muslim substitute in question, while the latter felt away as Pluto, arguing that the young wanted her outside of school or country. Il passera en janvier au conseil disciplinaire de l'école pour avoir tenu une comparaison discriminatoire raciale. He will spent January to disciplinary board of the school for having a discriminatory racial comparison.
Do you understand me, Richard? Do you understand the identity right? Do you understand Hérouxville? I am accused of selling to people under 15 some copies of swastikas, and copies of Mein Kemp, while Mein Kemp is consumed only when people are 16 or 18 years. It's less violent than the Bible, the Koran and the Torah, but it is frowned to read to children, so I read it for young adults.
Publish what you want, I continue my political actions, and I'll take away the most children as possible from the clutches of multiculturalism.
Merry Christmas,
Sincerely,
Francis Chartrand
Militant secular
Labels: Francis Chartrand, Multiculturalism, Richard Martineau, Secularism
We must stop the islamists of indoctrinate youth, by Francis Chartrand
Karl von Clausewitz, one of the major theorists of war wrote: "The purpose of all war must be to establish a better situation before the outbreak of hostilities." After a decade of struggle against international terrorism, how can we know if the situation improved?
We could take to measure the frequency of terrorist attacks. Since early 2009, more than 7,500 people were killed in bombings 5.000 on 4 continents. It is much better than last year where over 15,000 people have died in more than 11,000 attacks. Osama bin Laden and his organization al-Qaeda have been unable to organize attacks comparable in importance to those of 11 September against the towers of the World Trade Center. And they have not managed to get their hands on a nuclear weapon. Can we conclude that terrorism has become a less urgent threat and that the situation has improved since hostilities began? The public in Australia think it. A survey of Autralian Strategic Policy Institute conducted last year showed that terrorism had fallen to 13th among the 14 major concerns in the 2007 elections. Two thirds of Australians believe that the terrorist threat is part of everyday life. Climate change is regarded as the new terrorism.
But when asked if the Australian government did everything it could to prevent a terrorist attack, the voter response was unequivocal. Only 50% thought the government controlled the situation. Although nearly 10 billion dollars have been spent since 2001 to improve security measures, 41% of voters said that the government could do better. Because there has been no serious attacks in Australia since the explosion of a bomb at the Sydney Hotel in 1978, some believe that the threat is so low that it could now spend less money national security.
Resources are limited and as there are many other concerns such as cyber crime or organized, it begins to say it would be better to give less importance to the terrorist threat. This is not what I think. The real danger is complacency about the nature and extent of threat nourished by religious ideology.
As stated recently Peter Clark of the British police: "The terrorist threat is of such magnitude and so intractable that we should not just be content to chase those planning attacks. We must find a way to attack the ideas that motivate them to do so."
The number of terrorists in the world may be decreased, but the ideology that fuels international terrorism continues to seduce the minds of Somalia to the southern Philippines. And children are increasingly the target of this ideological indoctrination. In Indonesia, the radical group Hizb ut-Tahrir is particularly interested in schools, providing books for teens that encourages them to overthrow the secular democracy and replace it with Islamic law (Sharia) and a caliphate.
While such organizations are careful not to openly promote violence, the link between propaganda, radicalization of minds and terrorism is well established.
And the Internet helps to spread the message of extremists. Hizb ut-Tahrir has launched a website that competes with major international channels of information. Teenagers are the largest users of the Internet and social networking sites provide interactive terrorist groups new opportunities for recruitment and radicalization of minds.
Not surprisingly, a Somali terrorist organization is called al-Shabaad (Youth)
To achieve their goals, the ideologues are constantly finding new recruits. So they're training a new generation of terrorists, the international community seems unable to respond in a coherent and strategic.
Until now, the war against terrorism has been shared between 95% of military intervention and 5% of anti-ideological. This must change, because it is winning the ideological war that we may determine whether we succeeded or failed to stop this wave of religious terrorism.
Link
Labels: Australia, Francis Chartrand, Islam, Religion and fanaticism, Somalia, Sudan
Polytechnique in our heads, by Richard Martineau
Richard Martineau
Journal de Montréal
06/12/2009 07h20
Each year, the same thing. The more we approach the fateful date of December 6, the more masculinist radical groups are excited on the Internet.
They are like vampires who feel dawn the first glimmerings of dawn. They scream, spit, to convulse as if they threw the holy water.
THE FAULT TO FEMINIST
The worst of the strip, the more hysterical, the most worrisome are members of the group L'Après-rupture.
"The major organs begin feminist victimizers motion to mark the 20th anniversary of the Polytechnique tragedy, they wrote this week. Sad recovery based on emotions, melodramatic statements included in chorus by the media who prefer to serious analysis shows, impartial.
"Polytechnic, deplorable recovery by feminist organizations who must maintain their propaganda to ensure the payment of annual profit grants.
"Nobody asks the question: why Marc Lépine posed such a gesture? The answer is very simple. Lepine lived burgeoning feminism that demonizes men ..."
In short, if Lepine showed up at Polytechnique and shot 14 women, it is because of bad feminists.
This message would be laughable if it were not so disgusting ...
HE LEARNED IN THE FOOT
That masculinist groups campaigning to get more grants to help people in distress is one thing.
But does this mean Lépine portray as a poor victim of "feminist propaganda handsomely subsidized with taxpayer money"?
The members of L'Après-rupture did not they make that they shooting themselves in the foot by taking such a speech? They completely discredit their cause?
The solution does not remove money from groups of women: it is to give more groups of men!
As they say, we don't need to undress Ginette to dress Jacques. We just buy clothes for both ...
Instead of constantly shooting each other, and compare their wounds to know what sex is the most messed up, groups of men and women's groups should work TOGETHER to build a more harmonious and less aggressive.
A COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE STRATEGY?
That said, if I do not share the speech paranoid, misogynist and revenge L'Après-rupture, I confess I feel a certain unease in the discourse surrounding the Polytechnique massacre.
Not because I think the use of Poly is a "recovering feminist," as like to say masculinists radicals. But because I am afraid that this strategy is cons-productive.
Let me explain ...
Over the years, Poly has become a sort of symbol of violence against women.
But do you really think the guys who regularly beats his wife in his living room identified with Marc Lépine?
I doubt it. He said: "Lépine is a monster, an extreme case, a madman, a psychotic. It has nothing to do with me ..."
When they compare there life to Lépine, the "ordinary tyrants" are very nice, very accurate ... Real gentlemen.
A BAD SYMBOL
Do not misunderstand me: I'm not saying that we should not remind us remember the tragic memory of Poly.
Instead, I think it's essential. Like it or not, this terrible tragedy is part of our history.
But I think we should not make this event a symbol of everyday violence experienced by battered women. It's too big, too monstrous, too exceptional.
Link
Labels: Montréal, Québec, Richard Martineau
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]